Assessment of Dentinal Damage during Canal Preparation Using Reciprocating and Rotary Files

Kansal, Rohit; Rajput, Akhil; Talwar, Sangeeta; Roongta, Ruchika; Verma, Mahesh

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.015

Cited by 86 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For each selected study, risk ratios (RRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to evaluate the effect of the interventions. The heterogeneity of the 31) 2014 Data was described as histogram.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies relating to dentinal cracks formation during root canal enlargement with rotary files (multifile systems) and reciprocating files (single-file systems) were rejected for our meta-analysis, as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. However, we also completed a basic review of these studies 20,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] . We found that most of the results [30][31][32][33]36) were aligned with the results of our meta-analysis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with reciprocating single-file and rotary-file systems: A meta-analysis

Wei

Peng

et al. 2017

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a dangerous factor in vertical root fracture, dentinal crack formation is often associated with root canal instruments. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the influence of two types of nickel titanium (NiTi) instruments that have different movements (reciprocating single-file versus full-sequence rotary file systems) on dentinal cracks formation during root canal preparation. Searches were conducted in PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Embase and Cochrane Library using a combination of keywords. Titles and abstracts of all articles were independently assessed by two reviewers in accordance with the predefined inclusion criteria. Relevant studies were acquired in full-text form. Data in these articles were independently extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. The results showed that the WaveOne and Reciproc files with a reciprocating motion produced significantly fewer dentinal cracks than the conventional rotational ProTaper technique.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with reciprocating single-file and rotary-file systems: A meta-analysis

Wei

Peng

et al. 2017

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to these authors, preparation using only a single large‐tapered reciprocating instrument, which cuts substantial amounts of dentin in a short time, tends to cause or aggravate more dentinal defects than conventional preparation, which comprises a more progressive and slower mechanical enlargement. While some studies have found no difference regarding the kinematics of different systems on crack formation , most of them agreed that rotary instruments produce significantly more cracks than reciprocating instruments . It may be important to point out that among all preparation systems, ProTaper instruments have been frequently associated with the highest amount of crack initiation .…”

Section: Current Knowledgementioning

confidence: 98%

Critical appraisal of studies on dentinal radicular microcracks in endodontics: methodological issues, contemporary concepts, and future perspectives

Versiani¹,

Souza²,

De‐Deus³

2015

Endodontic Topics

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dentinal radicular microcrack is a difficult clinical problem to diagnose and treat, and it is one of the most common reasons for tooth extraction. These microcracks start in the radicular dentin, and laboratory studies have linked crack formation to some routine endodontic procedures, namely root canal preparation, obturation, and retreatment. Most of these studies were performed using destructive methods, such as the sectioning technique, previously developed for the study of the internal anatomy of teeth. Nowadays, technological advances in the field of imaging may lead to a more thorough understanding of dentinal microcracks. This article seeks to critically appraise the methodological aspects involved in the study of dentinal radicular microcrack formation after root canal preparation, obturation, and retreatment.

show abstract

“…[9] Kansal et al in his study also concluded that ProTaper when used in full sequence results in more microcracks formation than the other systems. [10] Wilcox et al stated that the if the removal of root dentin is more, then the chances of root fractures also increases. [11] The periodontal ligament was not been stimulated in this study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Effect of Hyflex EDM on Root Dentin during Root Canal Preparation-A Stereomicroscopic Study

Sankhe¹

2017

International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessment of Dentinal Damage during Canal Preparation Using Reciprocating and Rotary Files

Cited by 86 publications

References 25 publications

The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with reciprocating single-file and rotary-file systems: A meta-analysis

The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with reciprocating single-file and rotary-file systems: A meta-analysis

Critical appraisal of studies on dentinal radicular microcracks in endodontics: methodological issues, contemporary concepts, and future perspectives

Evaluation of Effect of Hyflex EDM on Root Dentin during Root Canal Preparation-A Stereomicroscopic Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About