2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Dentist Participation in Public Insurance Programs for Children in the US

Abstract: Key Points Question Are there disparities in dentist availability for delivering dental care to children within or between states? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 204 279 active dentists across the US, dentist participation in public insurance programs varied substantially across states, especially for states that manage the Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) separately and within states. Dentist participation was lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 documents regional disparities in access to or utilization of dental care that warrant further investigation. Recent literature has noted Alaska has a discrepancy among the statewide percentage of dentists participating in public insurance and the percentage participating at the borough level (Alaska's county‐level equivalent), suggesting some boroughs have a low percentage of dentists accepting or seeing Medicaid patients [33]. It is not known if this also applies to pediatric dentists or whether this influences the disparities in access or utilization of care that were noted here in Alaska's interior regions of the FNSB and the Other Interior Region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 documents regional disparities in access to or utilization of dental care that warrant further investigation. Recent literature has noted Alaska has a discrepancy among the statewide percentage of dentists participating in public insurance and the percentage participating at the borough level (Alaska's county‐level equivalent), suggesting some boroughs have a low percentage of dentists accepting or seeing Medicaid patients [33]. It is not known if this also applies to pediatric dentists or whether this influences the disparities in access or utilization of care that were noted here in Alaska's interior regions of the FNSB and the Other Interior Region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,10,22,23 A recent study reported that in California 5% of dentists in suburban areas and 3% in rural areas participated in Medicaid program. 24 Only 11% of pediatric dentists in California participated in state's Medicaid program, which is one of the lowest in the USA. 24 This further exacerbates the access to oral health care for children on government insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Moreover, not all dentists accept insurance, and fewer yet accept patients enrolled in Medicaid. [19][20][21] Public policies improving the affordability and availability of dental care remain warranted. Addressing the volatility of Medicaid dental systems is most urgent for low-income adults, who bear the greatest burden of oral cancer amidst a widening gap in dental service utilization trends among poor and nonpoor adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty million adults live in counties designated as dental professional shortage areas; requiring an influx of over ten thousand new dental practitioners to address the unmet need 18 . Moreover, not all dentists accept insurance, and fewer yet accept patients enrolled in Medicaid 19–21 . Public policies improving the affordability and availability of dental care remain warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%