1994
DOI: 10.1179/019713694806066428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Deterioration in Archaeological Wood from Ancient Egypt

Abstract: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gelatinous layer also appears to be resistant to soft rot fungi. In a recent investigation of archaeological wood from ancient Egyptian tombs, soft rot fungi caused an unusual form of attack within secondary wall layers (Blanchette et al 1994). The exceedingly thick wall layer dosest to cell lumina, suspected of being a gelatinous layer of tension wood cells, was not attacked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gelatinous layer also appears to be resistant to soft rot fungi. In a recent investigation of archaeological wood from ancient Egyptian tombs, soft rot fungi caused an unusual form of attack within secondary wall layers (Blanchette et al 1994). The exceedingly thick wall layer dosest to cell lumina, suspected of being a gelatinous layer of tension wood cells, was not attacked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in composition are also common between temperate and tropical hardwoods. Woods such as teak, mahogany and ebony have greater concentrations of lignin and wood extractives than many temperate hardwoods such as maple, birch, and aspen (Blanchette, Haight, Koestler, Hatcheld, & Arnold, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dry archaeological wood is rarer than waterlogged one. In fact, the completely dryness of wood can be reached only in particular sites, such as desert areas or places in which wood had been efficiently sheltered (houses, temples, tombs) [18][19][20]. As most of fungi and bacteria need water in their metabolism, wood with a water content much below the fibre saturation point is poorly degraded by microorganisms, whereas insects may still represent a significant threat [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most of fungi and bacteria need water in their metabolism, wood with a water content much below the fibre saturation point is poorly degraded by microorganisms, whereas insects may still represent a significant threat [1]. Three main factors of decay have been previously highlighted for some wood objects from Egyptian tombs: soft rot, brown rot, and an abiotic form of degradation [19]. Brown rot fungi mainly attack cellulose, causing depolymerisation and leaving a brown fragile residue rich in lignin [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%