2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02784-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of differences in morphological and physiological leaf lodging characteristics between two cultivars of Hippeastrum rutilum

Abstract: Background Environmental lodging stress, which is a result of numerous factors, is characterized by uncertainty. However, several studies related to lodging in cereal crops have reported that lodging in the Hippeastrum rutilum environment is very rare. Hippeastrum rutilum is a garden flower with high ornamental value and abundant germplasm resources. Under past cultivation practices, it was found that the plant types of ‘Red Lion’, with red flowers, and ‘Apple Blossom’, with pink flowers, are q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant saturation pulse light frequency was set to 20 s /times, the intensity to 4000 μmol m −2 s −1 , and the light intensity for actinic light parameters to 86 μmol m −2 s −1 . The plant samples were placed in darkness for 20 min; and then minimum fluorescence (Fo) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) of the samples were recorded by using the measuring light and saturated pulsed light, respectively (Shi et al, 2020). The value and image of NPQ (non‐photochemical quenching), Y(II) (actual photochemical efficiency), Y(NO) (non‐adjusting energy dissipation yield), qP (photochemical quenching), and electron quantum transport rate (ETR) were obtained through actinic light measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant saturation pulse light frequency was set to 20 s /times, the intensity to 4000 μmol m −2 s −1 , and the light intensity for actinic light parameters to 86 μmol m −2 s −1 . The plant samples were placed in darkness for 20 min; and then minimum fluorescence (Fo) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) of the samples were recorded by using the measuring light and saturated pulsed light, respectively (Shi et al, 2020). The value and image of NPQ (non‐photochemical quenching), Y(II) (actual photochemical efficiency), Y(NO) (non‐adjusting energy dissipation yield), qP (photochemical quenching), and electron quantum transport rate (ETR) were obtained through actinic light measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of GI and CK were measured using the Imagining-PAM (MAXI) system (Walz, Germany). The value (Ft) of the selected sample in area of interest (AOI) was set within the range of 0.1-0.2, plant saturation pulse light frequency was set to 20 s/times and the intensity was set to 4,000 µmol m −2 s −1 , and the light intensity for actinic light parameters was set to 86 µmol m −2 s −1 (Shi et al, 2020). The plant samples were treated in darkness for 20 min; minimum fluorescence (Fo) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) of the samples were obtained using the measuring light and saturated pulsed light, respectively.…”
Section: Leaf Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%