2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for simultaneous removal of arsenic and boron from spent geothermal water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also investigated the removal of trace boron using the fabricated N-TFN membranes. Boric acid (H 3 BO 3 ) is a trace pollutant widely present in seawater, groundwater, and many other water sources 48 . Low boron removal efficiency by membranes is largely due to the small size and neutral charge of H 3 BO 3 49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also investigated the removal of trace boron using the fabricated N-TFN membranes. Boric acid (H 3 BO 3 ) is a trace pollutant widely present in seawater, groundwater, and many other water sources 48 . Low boron removal efficiency by membranes is largely due to the small size and neutral charge of H 3 BO 3 49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large reduction of As concentrations by media and membrane filtration can be explained by the relatively large amount of adsorbent media with respect to the influent As concentration, and the high As removal efficiency of membranes (i.e., 71.53% for NF90 and 98.34% for BWRO30). Effective As removal by NF and BWRO membranes is in agreement with the previously reported results. , After Grsand filtrate underwent NF, initial total As concentrations in the permeate were 0.05 ± 0.07 μg/L, increasing to 0.18 ± 0.07 μg/L at 90% recovery. After Grsand filtrate underwent BWRO, initial total As concentrations of 0.03 ± 0.04 μg/L slightly decreased to 0.02 ± 0.02 μg/L at 90% recovery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Effective As removal by NF and BWRO membranes is in agreement with the previously reported results. 52,53 After Grsand filtrate underwent NF, initial total As concentrations in the permeate were 0.05 ± 0.07 μg/L, increasing to 0.18 ± 0.07 μg/L at 90% recovery. After Grsand filtrate underwent BWRO, initial total As concentrations of 0.03 ± 0.04 μg/L slightly decreased to 0.02 ± 0.02 μg/L at 90% recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of arsenic(V) from waters, wastewaters, or generally speaking, aqueous solutions, is a topic of the utmost importance for the scientific community though there are few technologies proposed for this task (Alka et al, 2021;Weerasundara and Bundschuh, 2021). Some recent investigations describe the use of micro-structured carbon-based (Islam et al, 2021) and modified incinerated sewage sludge ash (Gao et al, 2021) adsorbents; ion exchange using various resins (Dadakhanov et al, 2021), resin-supported nano-hydrated zirconium oxide (Deng et al, 2021), and an electrochemical-ion exchange hybrid method (Rathi et al, 2021); various membrane processes (Moreira et al, 2021;Sherugar et al, 2021;Rojas-Challa et al, 2021;Jarma et al, 2021;Lopez et al, 2021); and solvent extraction using a Triton X nonionic surfactant-choline chloride ionic liquid-water mixture (Silva et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%