2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Distal Radius Fracture Complications Among Adults 60 Years or Older

Abstract: Key Points Question Do rates or types of complications after distal radius fractures depend on treatment type? Findings In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 304 adults from 24 health systems, the method of treatment participants received was associated with the rate or type of complications. Compared with participants who received internal fixation, participants who received any other treatments experienced complications at significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have compared surgical methods for displaced DRFs with regard to functional, radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures in a variety of settings and patient groups. While long-term functional and patient-reported outcomes have been shown to be similar between the most frequently used surgical methods [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the spectrum and frequency of associated complications vary considerably [15][16][17]. It is therefore paramount that physicians treating patients with a displaced DRF are familiar with the complications associated with each treatment method in order to achieve the most favorable outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have compared surgical methods for displaced DRFs with regard to functional, radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures in a variety of settings and patient groups. While long-term functional and patient-reported outcomes have been shown to be similar between the most frequently used surgical methods [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the spectrum and frequency of associated complications vary considerably [15][16][17]. It is therefore paramount that physicians treating patients with a displaced DRF are familiar with the complications associated with each treatment method in order to achieve the most favorable outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We concluded that the complication rate for internal fixation was lower than that of patients receiving casting or an external fixator. 30 In this population-based analysis of ED visits following a DRF fracture, we found that patients receiving internal fixation had lower odds of a DRF-related ED visit compared with other surgical treatment modalities. In addition, we found that the average cost of 30-day DRF-related ED visits and resulting readmissions is $1,340 for surgical patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…SF-36 and MHQ were chosen as they are validated assessments of overall health and hand-specific disability respectively. [2,27,28] Functional outcomes included assessment of grip strength, wrist and forearm arc of motion at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months among the two groups. MHQ assessments were performed at the 6-week, 3-, 6-and 12-month time-points, whereas SF-36 was performed at the time of enrollment, 3-, 6-, and 12-months.…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%