2020
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of early lung disease in young children with CF: A comparison between pressure‐controlled and free‐breathing chest computed tomography

Abstract: Background Chest computed tomography (CT) in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is sensitive in detecting early airways disease. The pressure‐controlled CT‐protocol combines a total lung capacity scan (TLC PC‐CT) with a near functional residual capacity scan (FRC PC‐CT) under general anesthesia, while another CT‐protocol is acquired during free breathing (FB‐CT) near functional residual capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity in detecting airways disease of both protocols in two cohorts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the speed of operation, CT scanning can be performed without anaesthesia, thus avoiding cumbersome logistics and anaesthetic recovery times [32,34,37,147]. Thus, CT appears to be higher-yielding and easier to perform than MRI for cross-sectional imaging in preschool patients with a new diagnosis of CF, especially when performed in uncooperative patients [32,[146][147][148]162 Follow-up CR versus CT Despite the absence of strong supporting evidence in the literature, CR remains the most frequently used imaging modality for lung disease monitoring in several specialist centres; this is due to its ready availability and low cost, and the decades-long use of this technique by CF clinicians during routine follow-up. However, the sensitivity of CR is poor, and inter-observer variability between radiologists is high, even when combined with adequate scoring systems [47,48,50].…”
Section: First Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the speed of operation, CT scanning can be performed without anaesthesia, thus avoiding cumbersome logistics and anaesthetic recovery times [32,34,37,147]. Thus, CT appears to be higher-yielding and easier to perform than MRI for cross-sectional imaging in preschool patients with a new diagnosis of CF, especially when performed in uncooperative patients [32,[146][147][148]162 Follow-up CR versus CT Despite the absence of strong supporting evidence in the literature, CR remains the most frequently used imaging modality for lung disease monitoring in several specialist centres; this is due to its ready availability and low cost, and the decades-long use of this technique by CF clinicians during routine follow-up. However, the sensitivity of CR is poor, and inter-observer variability between radiologists is high, even when combined with adequate scoring systems [47,48,50].…”
Section: First Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the speed of the latest generation of CT scanners, the entire chest can be scanned in less than a second. For this reason, CT scanning can be performed without anaesthesia, thus avoiding cumbersome logistics and anaesthetic recovery times [ 20 , 21 ]. When needed, young children can be immobilised in a vacuum mattress, providing consistent diagnostic image quality (Fig.…”
Section: Clinical Scenario and Imaging Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in CT scan modality between pressure‐controlled CT under general anesthesia to multi‐slice CT during free breathing without anesthesia were compared using findings from AREST‐CF cohort 49 . Comparison of this young cohort (median age around 4 years) used the PRAGMA‐CF score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%