“…Similarly, all the determined primordial radionuclides of this study represented similar trend as the surface soil samples of different countries in the subcontinent ( Mishra, 2004 ; Matiullah et al., 2004 ; Mandal and Sengupta, 2005 ; Fatima et al., 2007 ; Prasad et al., 2008 ; Shanthi et al., 2010 ; Badhan and Mehra, 2012 ; Babai et al., 2013 ; Dhawal et al., 2013 ; Sahoo et al., 2016 ; Pillai et al., 2017 ; Bramha et al., 2018 ). Herein, 226 Ra activities are greater than 232 Th in the dust samples of this work which is concomitant with the world literature values ( Bem et al., 2002 ; Papp et al., 2002 ; Faghihi et al., 2011 ; Flues et al., 2002 ; Dai et al., 2022 ; Amin et al., 2008 ; Arogunjo et al., 2009 ; Karamanis et al., 2009 ; Ribeiro et al., 2010 ; Otansev et al., 2012 ; Tufan and Bostanci, 2012 ; Amin et al., 2013 ; Charro et al., 2013 ; Papaefthymiou et al., 2013 ; Cujic et al., 2015 ; El-Mekawy et al., 2015 ; Liu et al., 2015 ; Alzubaidi et al., 2016 ; Goren et al., 2017 ; Zhang, 2017 ) while median n=23 value of 40 K activity in this study was relatively greater than the global median value. Hence, the variation of 40 K activities generated from differential geochemical settings while the discrepancy of 226 Ra activity concentrations between the classroom-dusts of this work and the surface soils n=45 ( Table 4 ) assumed to be derived from natural or/and the non-natural processes.…”