2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability

Abstract: Abstract. Projections of streamflow, particularly of extreme flows under climate change, are essential for future water resources management and the development of adaptation strategies to floods and droughts. However, these projections are subject to uncertainties originating from different sources. In this study, we explored the possible changes in future streamflow, particularly for high and low flows, under climate change in the Qu River basin, eastern China. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was employed to qu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the rain-gauge-and SPP-based daily streamflow data sets in Period II that correspond to the observed daily high, normal, and low flows were quantitatively evaluated in accordance with CC and BIAS. Extreme flows are essential for water resources management [40]. This study assessed the performance of the four SPPs in reproducing daily streamflow at different levels.…”
Section: Daily Streamflow Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the rain-gauge-and SPP-based daily streamflow data sets in Period II that correspond to the observed daily high, normal, and low flows were quantitatively evaluated in accordance with CC and BIAS. Extreme flows are essential for water resources management [40]. This study assessed the performance of the four SPPs in reproducing daily streamflow at different levels.…”
Section: Daily Streamflow Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), we assume an unchanged land use and that vegetation has not adapted its root-zone storage capacity to the aridity and seasonality of the 2K climate. This scenario implies stationarity of model parameters by using S R,max,A in both the historical and 2K runs, a common assumption of many climate change impact assessment studies (Booij, 2005;de Wit et al, 2007;Prudhomme et al, 2014;Hakala et al, 2019;Brunner et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2020;Rottler et al, 2020). This is the benchmark scenario against which we compare the hydrological response considering non-stationarity of the system, as in the following three scenarios.…”
Section: Scenario 2kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCP scenario also carries uncertainty because it is a model that is predicted based on carbon emissions and human activity. However, many studies have been conducted to quantify and reduce the uncertainty of the RCP scenario [31].…”
Section: Data 241 Climate Change Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%