2019
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fasted and fed gastrointestinal contraction frequencies in healthy subjects using continuously tagged MRI

Abstract: Background: Continuously tagged MRI during free breathing can assess bowel motility at frequencies as low as the slow wave, motility pattern range. This study aimed to evaluate noninvasive gastrointestinal-tagged MRI for small bowel motility assessment and to observe the physiological response to a 300-kcal meal challenge in healthy, overnight-fasted volunteers.Methods: After overnight fasting, 16 healthy subjects (7 women, mean age 25.5, range 19-37 years) underwent a free breathing, tagged MRI scan to captur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we present a workaround by employing an automatic surface-based analysis of the luminal boundary motion in the stomach. The dominant frequency of gastric contraction measured with our automated method (ie, 3.09 ± 0.07 CPM) showed good correspondence to previously reported frequencies (also around 3CPM) measured with MRI, 19,41 scintigraphy, 42 manometry, 43 or electrogastrogram. 29,44 Uniquely, this surface-based representation provides a way for researchers and clinicians to visualize motility patterns of the entire stomach rather than just within a region of interest, and has the potential to normalize motility patterns across individuals through surface registration.…”
Section: Analysis and Representation Of Gastric Motility On The Luminal Surfacesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, we present a workaround by employing an automatic surface-based analysis of the luminal boundary motion in the stomach. The dominant frequency of gastric contraction measured with our automated method (ie, 3.09 ± 0.07 CPM) showed good correspondence to previously reported frequencies (also around 3CPM) measured with MRI, 19,41 scintigraphy, 42 manometry, 43 or electrogastrogram. 29,44 Uniquely, this surface-based representation provides a way for researchers and clinicians to visualize motility patterns of the entire stomach rather than just within a region of interest, and has the potential to normalize motility patterns across individuals through surface registration.…”
Section: Analysis and Representation Of Gastric Motility On The Luminal Surfacesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The benefits of this method are as follows: (1) it provides a quantitative measure of motion within the bowel, as well as of the bowel itself; (2) it can be performed using off‐the‐shelf MRI sequences; (3) it can be applied in three dimensions to better track bowel anatomy; and (4) it complements existing surrogate measures in a manner that will enhance the field. Further, it is one of only a handful of approaches that have been applied with minimal bowel preparation, with others having been reported by de Jonge et al and Khalaf et al 31,32 The quantitative measure of velocity we obtain, along with the degree of antegrade or retrograde motion along the long axis of the looping bowel, permits the definition of expected laminar flow, provided there is sufficient image contrast between materials in the lumen. The information on retrograde motion we show here also has value: for example, when the ileocaecal valve is incontinent, as a result of surgery or an inflammatory condition such as Crohn's disease, retrograde motion can lead to large bowel bacteria colonising the small bowel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This might enable more precise bowel motion quantification or more advanced analysis techniques such as power spectrum analysis. 8 Also, adding MRI tagging during acquisition 37 may greatly improve the quality of motion quantification as this guides deformable registration algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%