2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12403-012-0073-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Fecal Coliform and Escherichia Coli Across a Land Cover Gradient in West Georgia Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial model in this study suggested that agricultural land, impervious land and industry were the dominant sources of the fecal pollution. This result is consistent with Crim et al (2012), who focused on watersheds with different land uses in four countries. Unexpectedly, forest was identified as a significant factor with a positive correlation.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Fc Concentration In Differensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The spatial model in this study suggested that agricultural land, impervious land and industry were the dominant sources of the fecal pollution. This result is consistent with Crim et al (2012), who focused on watersheds with different land uses in four countries. Unexpectedly, forest was identified as a significant factor with a positive correlation.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Fc Concentration In Differensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All treatment watersheds had mean E. coli concentrations that exceeded 126 cfu 100 ml −1 , whereas the reference watersheds were below this threshold. Median E. coli concentrations at the treatment watersheds were similar to those measured in nearby urban watersheds (Crim, Schoonover, & Lockaby, 2012), despite the lack of surface runoff from developed areas and other anthropogenic sources at our study sites. Treatment and reference watersheds both lacked livestock and had the same wildlife species (and sources of fecal matter) except for wild pigs; therefore, the elevated E. coli concentrations at the treatment watersheds were likely a result of wild pig activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Treatment and reference watersheds both lacked livestock and had the same wildlife species (and sources of fecal matter) except for wild pigs; therefore, the elevated E. coli concentrations at the treatment watersheds were likely a result of wild pig activity. Unlike E. coli, FC concentrations did not vary by treatment type and were elevated in comparison to nearby urban watersheds (Crim, Schoonover, & Lockaby, 2012). Although instantaneous loads of FC were greater at reference watersheds, this can be attributed to greater discharge rates, as previously mentioned.…”
Section: Fecal Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suitability of the region for elevated pathogen levels is significant. In low-order streams of the Alabama coastal forest, E. coli levels were found in to be as high as those of urban streams following storms that result in sewer overflow [90,92]. Decreases in base flow result in greater concentrations of pathogens per mL, which increases the chance of the consumption of disease-causing loads of pathogens by animals [93].…”
Section: Impacts Of Wild Pigs: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%