2021
DOI: 10.1186/s43043-021-00075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fetal growth and anomalies in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: an Egyptian pilot study

Abstract: Background Many issues need to be studied regarding pregnant women during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess fetal growth, fetal well-being, and any observed gross anomalies that may follow SARS-CoV-2 infection in Egyptian pregnant women. During fetal anomaly scan at 22 weeks, we compared 30 pregnant women with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 6‑12 weeks of gestation (group A) with 60 pregnant women (group B) who had no history of SARS-CoV-2. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
1
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in accordance with Eltemamy and colleagues and Soto-Torres and colleagues, who demonstrated the absence of significant differences in fetal growth and Doppler measurements. 13 , 14 In addition, our findings are in accordance with both Ayhan and colleagues, 15 who found no difference in fetal Doppler values, and Narang and colleagues, who reported no difference in the rate of fetal growth restriction in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. 13 , 17 Our UA Doppler findings and the previously mentioned studies are in contrast to the findings of Anuk and colleagues, who reported an increase in the pulsatility and resistance indices of the umbilical artery in 30 pregnant women who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 compared to 40 noninfected pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are in accordance with Eltemamy and colleagues and Soto-Torres and colleagues, who demonstrated the absence of significant differences in fetal growth and Doppler measurements. 13 , 14 In addition, our findings are in accordance with both Ayhan and colleagues, 15 who found no difference in fetal Doppler values, and Narang and colleagues, who reported no difference in the rate of fetal growth restriction in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. 13 , 17 Our UA Doppler findings and the previously mentioned studies are in contrast to the findings of Anuk and colleagues, who reported an increase in the pulsatility and resistance indices of the umbilical artery in 30 pregnant women who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 compared to 40 noninfected pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Contrary to our expectations, the rate of IUGR/SGA, OH, abnormal fetal Doppler studies, and congenital anomalies were notably higher in the control group. This leads us to conclude that COVID-19 is not associated with adverse fetal outcome, as reported earlier [15]. A meta-analysis published estimates of the low incidence of IUGR (2.6%) in women infected with COVID-19 [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The authors found no significant differences in fetal growth parameters, Doppler study, and rate of gross structural anomalies in regular antenatal visits of the cases group (pregnant women with no risk factors, normal nuchal translucency, and history of confirmed positive SARS-Cov-2 in their first trimester) compared to controls group. [36] Similar results were found in a retrospective cohort study where Narang et al also concluded that there were no significant differences in the rate of intrauterine growth retardation rate in mild or asymptomatic SARS-Cov-2 infected pregnant women, irrespective of the timing of infection, compared to those with a negative infection result (3.4% vs 4.8%, p=0.36) [37].…”
Section: Intrauterine Growth Retardationsupporting
confidence: 69%