Assessment of Field-in-Field, 3-Field, and 4-Field Treatment Planning Methods for Radiotherapy of Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer

Abstract

Background: Gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer is the fastest-growing tumor, particularly in the United States (US).Objective: This study aimed to compare dosimetric and radiobiological factors among field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB) radiotherapy planning techniques for gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Material and Methods:In this experimental study, thirty patients with GE junction cancer were evaluated, and three planning techniques (field-in-field (FIF), three-field (3F), and four-field box (4FB)) were performed for each patient for a 6-MV photon beam. Dose distribution in the target volume, the monitor units (MUs) required, and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OARs) were compared for these techniques using the paired-sample t-test.Results: A significant difference was measured between the FIF and 3F techniques with respect to conformity index (CI), dose homogeneity index (HI), and tumor control probability (TCP) for the target organ, as well as the D mean for the heart, kidneys, and liver. For the spinal cord, the FIF technique showed a slight reduction in the maximum dose compared to the other two techniques. In addition, the V 20 Gy of the lungs and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of all OARs were reduced with FIF method. Conclusion:The FIF technique showed better performance for treating patients with gastro-esophageal junction tumors, in terms of dose homogeneity in the target, conformity of the radiation field with the target volume, TCP, less dose to healthy organs, and fewer MU.

Automatic Radiobiological Comparison of Radiation Therapy Plans: An Application to Gastric Cancer

“…The minimum difference for irradiated males was 2.2%. The calculated TCP values were consistent with those reported by Mehri-Kakavand et al [ 19 ], who examined patients subjected to radiotherapy for gastro-esophageal junction cancer.…”

“…The algorithm of the software incorporates Equations (3)–(6). The required parameters TD 50 , α, α/β and γ 50 for the NTCP calculation of twenty-three different critical organs were taken from the literature [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], and they were inserted into the software. The above parameters are summarized in Table 2 .…”