2004
DOI: 10.1080/13504500409469835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of forest vegetation and conservation priorities of communities in part of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, West Himalaya. Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prioritization of habitats and communities has been done using eight parameters like species richness, economically important, native, endemic, threatened plants, altitude, site representation and habitats number following Joshi and Samant (2004) >45 >45 >40 >40 1 <200 1 8 46-50 41-45 41-45 36-40 36-40 2 200-400 2 6 41-45 36-40 36-40 31-35 31-35 3 400-600 3 4 36 …”
Section: Prioritization Of Habitats and Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prioritization of habitats and communities has been done using eight parameters like species richness, economically important, native, endemic, threatened plants, altitude, site representation and habitats number following Joshi and Samant (2004) >45 >45 >40 >40 1 <200 1 8 46-50 41-45 41-45 36-40 36-40 2 200-400 2 6 41-45 36-40 36-40 31-35 31-35 3 400-600 3 4 36 …”
Section: Prioritization Of Habitats and Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the protected areas of the IHR including Reserve Forests have been very poorly evaluated for the structural and functional diversity [34] except a few studies carried out in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) and Askot Wildlife Sanctuary (AWLS) [35][36][37][38][39]. Further, studies integrating compositional, structural and functional diversity, native, endemic, economically important and rare-endangered species, and prioritization of community for conservation have been attempted in a few protected areas [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the protected areas of the IHR including Reserve Forests have been very poorly evaluated for the structural and functional diversity [34] except a few studies carried out in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) and Askot Wildlife Sanctuary (AWLS) [35][36][37][38][39]. Further, studies integrating compositional, structural and functional diversity, native, endemic, economically important and rare-endangered species, and prioritization of community for conservation have been attempted in a few protected areas [37,38]. Therefore, the attempt has been made to; (i) study the site/habitat characteristics; (ii) assess the diversity and distribution pattern of the species; (iii) delineate forest communities; (iv) study the distribution pattern of economically important, native, endemic and rareendangered species within the identified communities; and (v) prioritize communities for conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protecting such processes can ensure the continued provision of ecosystem services (Balmford et al, ). Therefore, prioritization of communities for conservation is essentially required (Joshi & Samant, ). In CDBR, plant communities, E. gerardiana—L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%