2020
DOI: 10.4317/jced.56854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fractures in endodontically treated teeth restored with and without root canal posts using high-resolution cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: Background Root fractures are a diagnostic challenge for dentists in endodontic treatment. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the characteristics of tooth fractures and the presence of root canal posts in endodontically treated teeth using high-resolution cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods Fifty high-resolution CBCT scans of endodontically treated teeth with a diagnosis of fracture were obtained, of which 30 were from women an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of VRF is a challenge for clinicians and endodontists and its early detection directly influences treatment planning (Tsesis et al, 2010). In the present study, there were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy between the diagnostic methods based on the plate system and on CBCT scans, as also observed by others (Aristizabal-Elejalde et al, 2020). While the diagnostic methods were considered variable, both methods showed 50% sensitivity regarding the fracture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The diagnosis of VRF is a challenge for clinicians and endodontists and its early detection directly influences treatment planning (Tsesis et al, 2010). In the present study, there were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy between the diagnostic methods based on the plate system and on CBCT scans, as also observed by others (Aristizabal-Elejalde et al, 2020). While the diagnostic methods were considered variable, both methods showed 50% sensitivity regarding the fracture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Although systematic reviews have reported that the sensitivity and specificity of CBCT are about 75% to 84% and 64% to 65%, respectively (Chang et al, 2016;Talwar et al, 2016), a more recent study detected 24% sensitivity when analysing unmanipulated radiographic images and 80% sensitivity for volumetric analysis, demonstrating a good ability to identify VRF (Aristizabal-Elejalde et al, 2020). Of note, we used a voxel of 0.2 mm, as recommended by other studies (Hassan et al, 2009;Kobayashi-Velasco et al, 2017;Wenzel et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The production of artefacts in CBCT images is associated with a decrease in diagnostic accuracy for VRFs. 5 7 8 High-density dental materials can produce artefacts, such as hyperdense streaks and hypodense bands; these may be superimposed on the root fracture line, preventing fracture detection. 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%