2017
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of frozen section margin analysis during olfactory neuroblastoma surgery

Abstract: NA. Laryngoscope, 127:1735-1741, 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On permanent histopathological analysis, however, we found microscopic foci of tumor cells in 35% of cases. In a recently published study, 16 we examined the performance of frozen section analysis in ONB and found a sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.96, an accuracy of 0.95, a positive predictive value of 0.86, a negative predictive value of 0.97, a likelihood ratio positive of 24.38, a likelihood ratio negative of 0.11, and a prevalence of 0.20. Based on these metrics and the number of samples we take per case, which in this study averaged 25.3, the finding of falsely negative frozen margins in 35% of cases is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On permanent histopathological analysis, however, we found microscopic foci of tumor cells in 35% of cases. In a recently published study, 16 we examined the performance of frozen section analysis in ONB and found a sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.96, an accuracy of 0.95, a positive predictive value of 0.86, a negative predictive value of 0.97, a likelihood ratio positive of 24.38, a likelihood ratio negative of 0.11, and a prevalence of 0.20. Based on these metrics and the number of samples we take per case, which in this study averaged 25.3, the finding of falsely negative frozen margins in 35% of cases is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performance of IFSH compared with FFPE is more widely described than in other head and neck sites owing to the relative rarity of sinonasal and skull base tumors. The reported accuracy of IFSH varies considerably but is typically lower for sinonasal and skull base neoplasms compared with other head and neck sites 2,5,7–9 . In addition, extrapolating results from the head and neck literature to sinonasal pathologies is problematic due to the different histopathologies encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…esthesioneuroblastoma, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 96%, and 95%, respectively, however, similar to our study the sensitivity is less than 90%. 9 Interestingly, in another study of endoscopically resected esthesioneuroblastoma by the same author, 1 IFSH specimen (5% of cases) was positive initially but on FFPE 10 IFSH specimens were positive (35% of cases), which they attributed to the to the high number of IFSH samples taken per case intraoperatively. 11 In our study, the sensitivity for the "other" group was 94.4%; however, this group is a collection of rare pathologies, which limits meaningful interpretation.…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance and Utility Of Ifshmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the transfer, prior to the sectioning, several inevitable factors can lead to the creation of frozen artifacts [23]. These frozen section artifacts result in a decrease of resolution of the microscopic images and, therefore, it is important to recognize these artifacts to obtain a correct interpretation [23,24].…”
Section: Current State Of Tumor Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%