2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-0917-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of genetic diversity within and between pearl millet landraces

Abstract: A minimum core subset of pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], which comprised 504 landrace accessions, was recently established from the global pearl millet germplasm collection of ICRISAT. The accessions for this core were selected by a random proportional sampling strategy following stratification of the entire landrace collection (about 16,000 accessions) according to their geographic origin and morpho-agronomic traits. In this study RFLP probes were used to quantify the genetic diversity within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AFLP analyses of genetic variation within and among South American hexaploid accessions and taxa of Bromus section Ceratochloa showed a diversity of 94% among accessions and an average diversity of 47% within taxonomic groups of hexaploid accessions (Massa et al 2001). Assessment of genetic diversity in pearl millet using RFLP revealed 30.9% variability within accessions and 69.1% between accessions (Bhattacharjee et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AFLP analyses of genetic variation within and among South American hexaploid accessions and taxa of Bromus section Ceratochloa showed a diversity of 94% among accessions and an average diversity of 47% within taxonomic groups of hexaploid accessions (Massa et al 2001). Assessment of genetic diversity in pearl millet using RFLP revealed 30.9% variability within accessions and 69.1% between accessions (Bhattacharjee et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the present study, heterologous RFLP markers were used to estimate polymorphism and genetic diversity within and between three synthetic cultivars, 'Alamo', 'Kanlow', and 'Summer' widely used in biomass-energy breeding programs. RFLP markers have been used in studies of genetic diversity in several grasses including rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Zhang et al 1992), maize (Gauthier et al 2002), and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) (Bhattacharjee et al 2002). Even though they are more laborious and time consuming compared to RAPD and AFLP (Karp et al 1996), RFLPs are locus specific and more repeatable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such genetic differences in pearl millet have been studied previously by morphological and isozyme analysis (Tostain et al 1987;Tostain and Marchais, 1989;Tostain, 1992). Subsequently, RAPDs (Chowdari et al 1998), RFLPs (Bhattacharjee et al 2002), and SSRs (Budak et al 2003;Kapila et al 2008) and combinations of SSRs with other PCR-compatible markers (Thudi et al 2010) have been used to estimate pearl millet genetic diversity. The power of DArT fingerprinting method lies in its ability to compare different genomes at a large number of loci in a single assay, at an average cost per marker locus that is very low compared with PCR-compatible markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genetic tools have been used to develop a DNA marker-based linkage map for pearl millet (Liu et al, 1994), and to map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) conferring resistance to biotic stresses (Jones et al, 1995, 2002; Morgan et al, 1998) and tolerance to terminal drought stress (Yadav et al, 2002b). They have also been used for: (1) identification of QTLs for flowering time, that appear to be largely responsible for genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) for grain and stover yield under favorable growing conditions (Yadav et al, 2002a); (2) diversity assessment (Liu et al, 1992; Bhattacharjee et al, 2002); (3) studies of recombination rates (Busso et al, 1995; Liu et al, 1996); (4) analysis of the domestication syndrome (Poncet et al, 2000, 2002); and (5) comparative genomics (Devos et al, 1998; Devos and Gale, 2000). …”
Section: General Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%