2013
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2013.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Genome Damage in Bird and Mammal Species as a Tool for Improvements in ex-situ Conservation at Zoos

Abstract: Ex-situ conservation at zoos requires strategies regarding improvements to enclosures, as ex-situ conserved specimens constitute an effective reservoir for genetic and biological restoration. The present study focuses on the management of enclosures at zoos and offering an accurate, fast and inexpensive procedure for ex-situ conservation through the assessment of the degree of genome damage (micronuclei) in different bird and mammal species. Analyses of variance revealed statistically significant differences i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing these values, it becomes evident that only the Villa Amarka, Ayllu Cololo, Cañuhuma, and Nubepampa communities fall within the range of human spontaneous micronuclei frequency. The closest available data for MN in lymphocytes come from llamas (Lama glama and Lama glama glama) from zoos in Mexico and Brazil, with spontaneous MN frequencies ranging from 0.03% to 0.04% (Camacho 1994;Zúñiga et al 1996;Adam et al 2013). These frequencies are lower than those observed in this study, with the only community exhibiting values close to these being Apacheta (0.07%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing these values, it becomes evident that only the Villa Amarka, Ayllu Cololo, Cañuhuma, and Nubepampa communities fall within the range of human spontaneous micronuclei frequency. The closest available data for MN in lymphocytes come from llamas (Lama glama and Lama glama glama) from zoos in Mexico and Brazil, with spontaneous MN frequencies ranging from 0.03% to 0.04% (Camacho 1994;Zúñiga et al 1996;Adam et al 2013). These frequencies are lower than those observed in this study, with the only community exhibiting values close to these being Apacheta (0.07%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%