2018
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000001544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage After Boston Keratoprosthesis Implantation Based on Digital Planimetric Quantification of Visual Fields and Optic Nerve Head Imaging

Abstract: Clinicians should strive to vigilantly monitor for glaucoma despite the inherent difficulties in tonometry, optic nerve visualization and imaging, and visual field testing in KPro patients. Meticulous glaucoma surveillance with structural and functional testing combined with earlier IOP-lowering surgical intervention may result in decreased rates of glaucomatous vision loss in KPro patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We have been confronted with the complication of glaucoma because of our interest in artificial corneas. [2][3][4] After marked improvements in postoperative management and also in design during the past 2 decades, such devices can give great vision in the short and intermediate terms, if the rest of the eye allows, but severe glaucoma can still in the long run be the most significant complication [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We have been confronted with the complication of glaucoma because of our interest in artificial corneas. [2][3][4] After marked improvements in postoperative management and also in design during the past 2 decades, such devices can give great vision in the short and intermediate terms, if the rest of the eye allows, but severe glaucoma can still in the long run be the most significant complication [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaucoma is the leading cause of permanent visual loss in BKPro. 51 Prevalence of preexisting glaucoma varied from 33.3% to 89.3% 62 Our report found that 20.2-40% of eyes had intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, 14-36% developed de-novo glaucoma and 13-33% had glaucoma progression (Table 1). Due to preexisting corneal pathology, it is difficult to accurately evaluate IOP, optic nerve and visual fields before BKPro surgery.…”
Section: Glaucoma-associated Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…85 In addition to better IOP monitoring, several publications advocate the use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT), 3D-optic nerve OCT, optic nerve head imaging and digital planimetric analysis of Goldman visual field, to better assess structural and functional glaucomatous change after BKPro implantation. 62,63,86 Many modalities are also postulated to prevent other BKPro-related complications. The lack of biointegration has long been considered one of the greatest BKPro downsides leading to a continuous risk of intraocular infection.…”
Section: Future Of Bkpromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at the optic nerve head with OCT is possible and could be a useful tool for monitoring glaucoma progression in KPro eyes. 26 , 27 Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning is the most common indicator of glaucoma progression. In fact, RNFL thinning may precede defects in the visual field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual field testing can also be used in the assessment of functional glaucomatous changes in KPro eyes. 26 , 27 Normally, Goldmann visual field (GVF) test is most commonly used to delineate visual field defects in KPro eyes. A novel method used digital planimetric analysis of GVFs was proposed by Ali et al 27 This method involved using the V4e isopter beyond the central 24 degrees for all patients, and a loss of more than 30% of surface area was considered as visual field deterioration in KPro eyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%