2022
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2021.2023959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Greek Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs in Physics Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, teachers' performance was slightly better the difference was not statistically significant. The results for teachers are like previous studies (Ecevit & Kingir, 2022;Koutsianou & Emvalotis, 2019;Stylos et al, 2023a). Students seem to achieve lower scores compared to students from similar surveys (Fausan & Pujiastuti, 2017;Fives et al, 2014;Tsoumanis et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although, teachers' performance was slightly better the difference was not statistically significant. The results for teachers are like previous studies (Ecevit & Kingir, 2022;Koutsianou & Emvalotis, 2019;Stylos et al, 2023a). Students seem to achieve lower scores compared to students from similar surveys (Fausan & Pujiastuti, 2017;Fives et al, 2014;Tsoumanis et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this case, it is possible to overestimate their efficacy beliefs in science and may be risk of setting up ambitious and demanding goals (Koutsianou & Emvalotis, 2019). Furthermore, the good self-efficacy level may be affected by the teachers' high school course specialization (Stylos et al, 2023a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After conducting a review of relevant literature, it was discovered that numerous studies have explored and documented the knowledge, perceptions, and alternative ideas of both students and teachers concerning various Physics concepts such as force and motion (Christonasis & Kotsis, 2022;Liu & Fang, 2016;Lopez, 2003;Rowlands et al, 2005;Stylos et al, 2008;Temiz & Yavuz, 2014), gravity (Gonen, 2008;Kikas, 2004;Sneider & Ohadi, 1998), energy (Lee, 2016;Kotsis & Panagou, 2023;Stylos & Kotsis, 2021;Stylos et al, 2017;Yeh et al, 2017), electricity (Metioui, 2022;Moodley & Gaigher, 2019;Widodo et al, 2018), and environment (Gontas et al, 2020(Gontas et al, , 2021Goulgouti et al, 2019;Gavrilakis et al, 2017;Papanikolaou et al, 2020Papanikolaou et al, , 2021. In contrast to engineering, which deals with tangible and concrete objects (Yalvac et al, 2007), electromagnetic fields, waves, and radiation are abstract and intangible concepts (Griffiths, 2017) that are challenging to comprehend through direct observation or sensory experiences (Papoulis, 1977).…”
Section: Didactics Of Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the CFA, factor loadings were assessed for each item. The model-fit measures were used to assess the model's overall goodness of fit (CMIN/df, CFI, TLI, SRMR, and RMSEA) and all values fell into acceptance levels (Haviz et al, 2020;Hern{ndez Fern{ndez & Camargo, 2022;Hu & Bentler, 1999;Mahat et al, 2018;Ullman, 2001;Stylos et al,, 2022;Stylos et al, 2023). The factor model (motivation, Practical, Critical) yielded a satisfactory fit for the data: CMIN/df= 0.214, CFI= 0.975, TLI=0.969, SRMR=0.05, and RMSEA=0.033.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Students' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Bio...mentioning
confidence: 99%