2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0149-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of ground motion selection criteria specified in current seismic provisions with an accurate selection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past two decades, plenty of research efforts have been made in developing spectra-matching-based IGM selection procedures for selecting and scaling proper IGMs for the NLRHA of building structures [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, the structural seismic demand is affected by the peak modal responses and the modal response combinations in the time domain, which is determined by the frequency contents combinations in the frequency domain (FCCFD) and time-domain (FCCTD) of IGMs, respectively [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, plenty of research efforts have been made in developing spectra-matching-based IGM selection procedures for selecting and scaling proper IGMs for the NLRHA of building structures [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, the structural seismic demand is affected by the peak modal responses and the modal response combinations in the time domain, which is determined by the frequency contents combinations in the frequency domain (FCCFD) and time-domain (FCCTD) of IGMs, respectively [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method for selecting records is code-based method. Despite the simplicity and practicality of this method, it has considerable drawbacks [1,2]. There are different efforts to improve this method and increase its accuracy in estimating the seismic performance of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%