2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-014-0216-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of groundwater potential based on aquifer properties of hard rock terrain in the Chittar–Uppodai watershed, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract: Aquifer performance was tested in 24 locations to assess the groundwater potential of the hard rock terrain in the Chittar-Uppodai watershed of the Tambaraparani River basin. Geologically, the area consists of biotite gneiss, charnockite, and quartzite. The aquifer characteristics, such as transmissivity (T), the storage coefficient, specific capacity, optimum yield, and the recovery rate were calculated. The drawdown transmissivity was determined using Jacob's straight-line method, while the recovery transmis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmissivity for borehole H27-0165, however, falls in the intermediate classification category by Krasny (1993). Transmissivity describes the general ability of an aquifer to transmit water over the entire saturated thickness, while hydraulic conductivity measures this ability by unit area (Kumar et al, 2016). The transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values obtained in this study therefore indicate that the aquifer in the study area mostly has low ability to transmit water through its entire thickness while the ability to transmit water per unit area of the aquifer was mostly medium, low and moderate hydraulic conductivities…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmissivity for borehole H27-0165, however, falls in the intermediate classification category by Krasny (1993). Transmissivity describes the general ability of an aquifer to transmit water over the entire saturated thickness, while hydraulic conductivity measures this ability by unit area (Kumar et al, 2016). The transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity values obtained in this study therefore indicate that the aquifer in the study area mostly has low ability to transmit water through its entire thickness while the ability to transmit water per unit area of the aquifer was mostly medium, low and moderate hydraulic conductivities…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmissivity is the result of the aquifer's saturated thickness and average hydraulic conductivity (Kruseman et al 2000;Kumar et al 2016). So, the transmissivity is directly proportional to the increase in the saturated thickness of the layer.…”
Section: Pumping Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 below shows various soil corrosivity for different soil resistivity values (Oladapo et al 2004;Ibanga and George, 2016). The protective capacity rating was inferred from the calculated longitudinal conductance (S) using protective capacity rating as shown in Table 2 (Kumar et al, 2016), where S is the sum of all the thickness/resistivity ratios of n − 1 layers which overlie a semi-infinite substratum of resistivity ρn, such that S = h1/ρ1 + h2/ρ2 + h3/ρ3 + … + hn−1/ρn−1 (mho), where h1, h2, etc. are the depths and ρ1, ρ2, etc.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%