2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Healing Environment in Paediatric Wards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). However, several of the instruments had a broad area of application for example ASPECT (Abbas & Ghazali ), AEDT (Ghazali & Abbas ) and DQI (Gann et al . ) and the environmental benchmarking instruments focusing mainly on green houses such as BREEAM (Schweber & Haroglu ) and LEED (Shulman ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). However, several of the instruments had a broad area of application for example ASPECT (Abbas & Ghazali ), AEDT (Ghazali & Abbas ) and DQI (Gann et al . ) and the environmental benchmarking instruments focusing mainly on green houses such as BREEAM (Schweber & Haroglu ) and LEED (Shulman ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First released in 2004, ASPECT is a tool for evaluating the quality of design of staff and patient environments in healthcare buildings. It delivers a profile that indicates the strengths and weaknesses of a design or an existing building and can be used as standalone form or for evaluation workshops [69][70][71]. Each indicator can be weighted as high (2), normal (1), or zero (0) and is evaluated with a six-point Likert scale.…”
Section: Health and Sustainability Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, 2013). According to Detweiler et al (2012), "healing gardens" or "therapeutic gardens" offer space for physical movements (Ghazali and Abbas, 2012), gardening activities and approximation with nature (Vries, 2010). The term "sensory garden", explains the sensory landscapes that are designed to accommodate the visually impaired, low mobility groups, aged or weak minded (Phillips and Butler, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%