Assessment of health facility quality improvements, United Republic of Tanzania

Abstract

Objective To identify contextual factors associated with quality improvements in primary health-care facilities in the United Republic of Tanzania between two star rating assessments, focusing on local district administration and proximity to other facilities. Methods Facilities underwent star rating assessments in 2015 and between 2017 and 2018; quality was rated from zero to five stars. The consolidated framework for implementation research, adapted to a low-income context, was used to identify variables associated with star rating improvements between assessments. Facility data were obtained from several secondary sources. The proportion of the variance in facility improvement observed at facility and district levels and the influence of nearby facilities and district administration were estimated using multilevel regression models and a hierarchical spatial autoregressive model, respectively. Findings Star ratings improved at 4028 of 5595 (72%) primary care facilities. Factors associated with improvement included: (i) star rating in 2015; (ii) facility type (e.g. hospital) and ownership (e.g. public); (iii) participation in, or eligibility for, a results-based financing programme; (iv) local population density; and (v) distance from a major road. Overall, 20% of the variance in facility improvement was associated with district administration. Geographical clustering indicated that improvement at a facility was also associated with improvements at nearby facilities. Conclusion Although the majority of facilities improved their star rating, there were substantial variations between facilities. Both district administration and proximity to high-performing facilities influenced improvements. Quality improvement interventions should take advantage of factors operating above the facility level, such as peer learning and peer pressure.

Effect of a multifaceted intervention to improve clinical quality of care through stepwise certification (SafeCare) in health-care facilities in Tanzania: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

“…Standardised patients completed a debriefing questionnaire on a smartphone using ODK Collect version 1.12.1 immediately after the visit, and supervisors verified the information with the standardised patient the same day. A follow-up telephone survey was done with facility managers to assess whether any standardised patients were detected (appendix pp [21][22].…”

“…20 Historically, public oversight of private health facilities has been weak, although more recently there has been a strong commitment to enhancing quality in both the public and private sectors, 21 since the roll-out of the government star rating initiative in 2015, which involves the inspection of all facilities and threats of closure for those that do not improve. 22 …”

Measuring user experience of care among caregivers of sick children: Validation and descriptive analysis in a sample of 75 health facilities in rural Tanzania

“…In addition, starting in 2015, the health ministry implemented star rating assessments [28,42]. Under this initiative, health facilities are assessed by a team of health workers and ministry officials, and assessment findings are used to inform quality improvement plans.…”

“…The assessments included a measure of user experience (5% of the overall score), but this was not focused on paediatric care [28]. While the 2015 baseline assessments revealed wide variation in the quality of care provided in different health facilities, the majority of facilities have improved their ratings by the next round of assessments in 2017-2018 [28,42].…”

Stepwise accreditation in Tanzania: no impact on process quality

“…Overall, Star Rating documented large improvements in quality across all facilities, but private for-profit ownership was associated with a 29% lower probability of improvement in a fully adjusted model (95% CI −0•37 to −0•22). 8 Moreover, facility managers and providers explicitly identified Star Rating's affiliation with Tanzania's Ministry of Health as a key enabling factor for improvement. It is difficult to determine how widely to generalise the results of King and colleagues' study, but easy to recognise that assumptions about standards-based quality improvement approaches need to be tested before interventions are adopted and scaled.…”