2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of households’ responses to the tsunami threat: A comparative study of Japan and New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within those 69% evaluated respondents, only 11% evacuated because of the environmental cue. There are similar patterns as well as significant differences between tsunami threats in relation to household reactions (16,18). More empirical evidence is needed to illustrate the impact variables on the evacuation decision and evacuation process (18).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within those 69% evaluated respondents, only 11% evacuated because of the environmental cue. There are similar patterns as well as significant differences between tsunami threats in relation to household reactions (16,18). More empirical evidence is needed to illustrate the impact variables on the evacuation decision and evacuation process (18).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In contrast, another research that studied the tsunami response behavior of two local earthquakes in New Zealand found that evacuation decisions are unrelated to ground shaking intensity and duration ( 17 ). Households in Hitachi had a higher level of tsunami risk perception and were more likely to evacuate than Christchurch households ( 18 ). Many respondents in the 2016 New Zealand earthquake event stated they were confused directly after the earthquake and waited for official sources to inform them of a potential tsunami evacuation ( 19 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When a tsunami actually approaches, people tend to wait for information and wonder if they really need to evacuate right away (Yamori 2014), although based on recent studies, how Fig. 1 The area impacted by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, location of the Nankai Trough, and cities and prefectures where field experiments were conducted in this study quickly people respond to early warning of tsunami varies widely (Lindell et al 2015;Fraser et al 2016;Wei et al 2017). Even if they are instructed to protect their own lives from the threat of a tsunami by following an ''everyone for themselves'' principle, many feel unable to ''leave family members to die'' and therefore await help while accepting that they may all ''go down together'' (Yamori 2014;Goltz 2017).…”
Section: Tsunami Evacuations: Interactions Between Human Systems and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, when we use information from the first responders, the evacuation is faster than when we use empirical equations from LifeSim. The finding that evacuations were completed more rapidly with the earthquaketsunami response data than with the LifeSim equations is due to the fact that, as long as the local population recognizes earthquake shaking as a tsunami warning cue, the shaking is an instantaneous broadcast mechanism (see Lindell et al, 2015;Wei et al, 2017). In those situations, k tends to 1 in Eq.…”
Section: Evacuation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%