2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12208614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Human Productivity Drivers for Construction Labor through Importance Rating and Risk Mapping

Abstract: Labor constitutes a significant portion of the overall cost of a construction project, where labor productivity is often the main driver of the cost. Although studies on labor productivity factors exist, their frequency of occurrence in terms of their ranking remains unexplored. This study differs from other studies in the literature by introducing the frequency component to the productivity factors, a more realistic ranking of the factors by adjusting the importance by frequency (frequency adjusted importance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many researchers have studied productivity analysis of construction resources with a decision support system to understand delay analysis for progress controlling, project completion date forecasting and cost estimation (Selvam et al , 2020). Several factors were researched to examine their impact on the productivity of construction resources, such as scheduled overtime (Abdul Kadir et al , 2005; El-Gohary and Aziz, 2014), change orders (Karim and Adeli, 1999), material management (Navon and Berkovich, 2005), weather (Ballesteros-Pérez et al , 2017; Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013) and human factors (Aryal et al , 2017; Gatti et al , 2014), poor resource management (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), low employee satisfaction (Abdul Kadir et al , 2005), low-skilled labour (Naoum, 2016), poor communication (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), complex technical specifications (Jarkas et al , 2012), poor labour supervision (Gunduz and Abu-Hijleh, 2020), rework (Ghoddousi et al , 2015), safety issues (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), motivation (Naoum, 2016). In the last few years, GPS and IoT sensors (such as UWB and RFID) have been extensively researched to determine the 3D locations of construction resources (equipment and labour) at a particular time to calculate their productivity (Brilakis et al , 2011).…”
Section: Qualitative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many researchers have studied productivity analysis of construction resources with a decision support system to understand delay analysis for progress controlling, project completion date forecasting and cost estimation (Selvam et al , 2020). Several factors were researched to examine their impact on the productivity of construction resources, such as scheduled overtime (Abdul Kadir et al , 2005; El-Gohary and Aziz, 2014), change orders (Karim and Adeli, 1999), material management (Navon and Berkovich, 2005), weather (Ballesteros-Pérez et al , 2017; Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013) and human factors (Aryal et al , 2017; Gatti et al , 2014), poor resource management (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), low employee satisfaction (Abdul Kadir et al , 2005), low-skilled labour (Naoum, 2016), poor communication (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), complex technical specifications (Jarkas et al , 2012), poor labour supervision (Gunduz and Abu-Hijleh, 2020), rework (Ghoddousi et al , 2015), safety issues (Thomas and Sudhakumar, 2013), motivation (Naoum, 2016). In the last few years, GPS and IoT sensors (such as UWB and RFID) have been extensively researched to determine the 3D locations of construction resources (equipment and labour) at a particular time to calculate their productivity (Brilakis et al , 2011).…”
Section: Qualitative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adopted the risk mapping to measure severity level of each barrier to work motivation and its probability of occurrence in construction projects. We decided the limits of each zone by looking at past studies applying the risk mapping [16,17]. Accordingly, the low-risk zone would have a severity times frequency (SF) value from 1 to less than 10, the moderate-risk zone would have a value from 10 to less than 14, and the high-risk zone would have a value from 14 to 25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure effective and punctual project delivery, cost control, and adherence to building rules and regulations while satisfying the needs of the employer, outstanding project management must be able to properly manage and organise labour, material, and equipment in construction projects (Gunduz and Abu-Hijleh, 2020). Productivity enhancement has always been a top concern for any profit-driven corporation, as it indicates the efficacy with which the firm's resources are translated into profitable outputs, ensuring firm profitability (Robles et al, 2014).…”
Section: Strategies To Cope With Covid-19 Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%