2002
DOI: 10.1080/01485010290031628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Human Sperm Morphology by Strict Criteria: Comparison of Wet Preparation Versus Stained With the Modified Diff-Quik Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of different staining techniques on sperm morphology and morphometry has been investigated (Davis and Gravance, 1993;Lacquet et al, 1996;Oral et al, 2002). A few studies acknowledge the fact that some staining techniques either increased or decreased the sperm head dimensions (Katz et al, 1986;Meschede et al, 1993;Franken et al, 2000;Hidalgo et al, 2006), but that in the case of The SCA w system recognizes the acrosome (yellow), head (blue) and midpiece (green).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of different staining techniques on sperm morphology and morphometry has been investigated (Davis and Gravance, 1993;Lacquet et al, 1996;Oral et al, 2002). A few studies acknowledge the fact that some staining techniques either increased or decreased the sperm head dimensions (Katz et al, 1986;Meschede et al, 1993;Franken et al, 2000;Hidalgo et al, 2006), but that in the case of The SCA w system recognizes the acrosome (yellow), head (blue) and midpiece (green).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step is evaluation of motility, the number of sperm and the proportions of live and dead sperm (Guzick et al 2001, Hidalgo et al 2006. The next step is morphological evaluation, which is increasingly expanded to include detailed morphometry of the spermatozoon (Oral et al 2002). There are situations, however, in which a motile and morphologically normal spermatozoon is incapable of fertilisation, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard semen analysis is the crucial tool in diagnosis and treatment of human and animal infertility (22). The most frequently assessed, and the most important semen parameters include concentration, motility, and morphology of the sperm (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the capacity of these cells to move is crucial at each moment of fertilisation since it indirectly facilitates the passage of the spermatozoon through the zona pellucida of the oocyte (6). Of the three parameters, sperm morphology is the most objective index of in vivo and in vitro fertility (22). Abnormal morphological structure of spermatozoa can be indicative of pathology underlying spermatogenesis disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%