2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of IGRT variability for lung SBRT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the lesion-based registrations between pCT and CBCT were performed manually, which results in some uncertainty in the assessment of the inter-lesion position variation. A recent study showed that the mean differences between observers was less than 1 mm in all directions [18]. For testing purposes, we included a 'worst-case scenario' 1.0 mm random error in all three directions in the margin calculation, which resulted in a maximum difference of 0.2 mm in the margin, which was observed only for SI for 3-fraction treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the lesion-based registrations between pCT and CBCT were performed manually, which results in some uncertainty in the assessment of the inter-lesion position variation. A recent study showed that the mean differences between observers was less than 1 mm in all directions [18]. For testing purposes, we included a 'worst-case scenario' 1.0 mm random error in all three directions in the margin calculation, which resulted in a maximum difference of 0.2 mm in the margin, which was observed only for SI for 3-fraction treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%