2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1955-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, current MPS-kits provide the option to multiplex various loci simultaneously within one reaction, such as STRs (autosomal, Y-and X-chromosomal), mitochondrial DNA (control region) as well as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that provide estimates of identity, phenotypic traits, biogeographical and ancestry information [21][22][23][24]. The inclusion of SNPs adds the benefit [25][26][27] that these markers allow for shorter amplicon design, which can support human identification of degraded or challenging DNA samples [28][29][30]. Although published studies have demonstrated that MPS is a promising tool for forensic applications, little is known about the method's variability and potential differences in the limit of detection between sequencing platforms from the same supplier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, current MPS-kits provide the option to multiplex various loci simultaneously within one reaction, such as STRs (autosomal, Y-and X-chromosomal), mitochondrial DNA (control region) as well as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that provide estimates of identity, phenotypic traits, biogeographical and ancestry information [21][22][23][24]. The inclusion of SNPs adds the benefit [25][26][27] that these markers allow for shorter amplicon design, which can support human identification of degraded or challenging DNA samples [28][29][30]. Although published studies have demonstrated that MPS is a promising tool for forensic applications, little is known about the method's variability and potential differences in the limit of detection between sequencing platforms from the same supplier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large-scale performances and functional tests had been widely validated for the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit, the DNA Primer Set A (DPMA, 152 loci totally: 27 common, forensic autosomal STRs, 24 Y-STRs, 7 X-STRs, and 94 identity informative SNPs) and the DNA Primer Set B (in total 230 loci: DMPA plus 22 phenotypic informative SNPs and 56 biogeographical ancestry SNPs), which also include robustness, reproducibility, species specificity, consistency and sensitivity of detection [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. In addition, the applicability of the DNA Signature Prep Kit had been evaluated and verified on challenging samples, DNA mixture, degradative DNA [48][49][50], formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues [49,51], and remains of skeletons and bones [48,[52][53][54], to extend the applications for forensic sciences [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Hence, on the basis of the sufficient validations of the stability and homogeneity, more essential data of worldwide populations are needed urgently at present to improve the standard experimental procedures, promote the efficiencies of MPS-based system, and strengthen and unify the contacts between capillary electrophoresis-based (CE-based) and MPS-based data for the basic and extended applications of forensic sciences and others.As the aborigines in Hainan island where was the entrances to East Asia (either the southern entrance from Indo-China peninsula or the northern entrance from Central Asia) [12,[69][70][71], Hainan...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al () found the ForenSeq™ library preparation was not affected when testing three commercial DNA extraction kits and one organic extraction method on the removal of common inhibitors; all methods sufficiently removed inhibitors from blood samples spiked with hematin, hair samples spiked with melanin, and bone samples spiked with calcium and humic acid.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%