2019
DOI: 10.1002/tox.22875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of impact of α‐Fe2O3 and γ‐Fe2O3 nanoparticles on phytoplankton species Selenastrum capricornutum and Nannochloropsis oculata

Abstract: In this study, the impact of alpha-iron oxide (α-Fe 2 O 3 , 20-40 nm) and gamma iron oxide (γ-Fe 2 O 3 , 20-40 nm) nanoparticles (NPs) on phytoplankton species Selenastrum capricornutum and Nannochloropsis oculata was investigated Characterizations of the NPs were systematically carried out by TEM, dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, X-ray diffraction, SEM, and Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy. Acute toxicity was tested between 0.2 and 50 mg/L for each NP for a period of 72 hours exposure. γ-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, thousands of metric tons of engineered nanoparticles are estimated to enter aquatic ecosystems each year (Keller et al., 2013, 2014), leading to their increasing concentration in water bodies (Sun et al., 2016), particularly in those impacted by urban run‐offs and effluents from wastewater treatment plants (Parker & Keller, 2019; Wang et al., 2020). While much effort has been devoted into understanding how nanopollution influences the environment, existing nanoecotoxicology research has largely focused on the responses of individual organisms and/or populations of the same species (Ates et al., 2020; Cheloni et al., 2016; Lodeiro et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2016), and to a lesser extent, trophic transfer of nanoparticles along food chains/webs (Babaei et al., 2022; Khoshnamvand et al., 2020; Rajput et al., 2020). By contrast, we know little about how nanoparticles affect competitive interactions among species, which are among the most important biotic factors shaping the structure of natural ecological communities (Connell, 1983; Gurevitch et al., 1992; Schoener, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, thousands of metric tons of engineered nanoparticles are estimated to enter aquatic ecosystems each year (Keller et al., 2013, 2014), leading to their increasing concentration in water bodies (Sun et al., 2016), particularly in those impacted by urban run‐offs and effluents from wastewater treatment plants (Parker & Keller, 2019; Wang et al., 2020). While much effort has been devoted into understanding how nanopollution influences the environment, existing nanoecotoxicology research has largely focused on the responses of individual organisms and/or populations of the same species (Ates et al., 2020; Cheloni et al., 2016; Lodeiro et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2016), and to a lesser extent, trophic transfer of nanoparticles along food chains/webs (Babaei et al., 2022; Khoshnamvand et al., 2020; Rajput et al., 2020). By contrast, we know little about how nanoparticles affect competitive interactions among species, which are among the most important biotic factors shaping the structure of natural ecological communities (Connell, 1983; Gurevitch et al., 1992; Schoener, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton are dominant primary producers of aquatic ecosystems (Cloern et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2019), where significant amounts of engineered nanoparticles have been released (Keller et al., 2013). While an increasing number of studies have addressed the toxicity of nanoparticles toward phytoplankton, these studies have mostly focussed on individual phytoplankton species (Ates et al., 2020; Bielmyer‐Fraser et al., 2014; Lodeiro et al., 2017). It is largely unknown how the presence of nanoparticles would influence phytoplankton interactions and ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aquatic environment, the accumulation of NPs of TiO 2 from discharges (e.g., nano paint, cosmetics and sunscreens, food additives) can disturb the environment and affect aquatic organisms (e.g., phytoplankton, Daphnia magna, fish, and bacteria) (Zhu et al 2010b, Fan et al 2016, Novak et al 2018, Liu et al 2019. Moreover, iron oxide NPs (Fe 2 O 3 ) are also frequently used in several sectors, such as water treatment, magnetic storage, cosmetics, and the chemical industry) (Ates et al 2020). However, occupational exposure to iron oxide nanoparticles leads to health and environmental risks (Farsi et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the combined advantages including rich abundance, low cost, and diverse species (metals/alloys, compounds and their composites) as well as praiseworthy physicochemical characteristics originating from the magical d electron configurations, functional materials based on transition metal elements have attracted extensive research interest. 4–10 Among them, α-Fe 2 O 3 with iron as the second most abundant metal element in the crust possesses the advantages of chemical stability, 11,12 redox activities, 13 low toxicity and cost, 14 etc. , and has been systematically studied for decades and widely applied in diverse fields including secondary batteries, 15,16 supercapacitors, 17 Fenton-like catalysts, 18 adsorbents, 19 photochemical oxidation reactions, 20,21 magnetics, 22 water–gas shift reaction, 23 and elevated-temperature CO oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%