2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10186416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Implicit and Explicit Measures of Mental Workload in Working Situations: Implications for Industry 4.0

Abstract: Nowadays, in the context of Industry 4.0, advanced working environments aim at achieving a high degree of human–machine collaboration. This phenomenon occurs, on the one hand, through the correct interpretation of operators’ data by machines that can adapt their functioning to support workers, and on the other hand, by ensuring the transparency of the actions of the system itself. This study used an ad hoc system that allowed the co-registration of a set of participants’ implicit and explicit (I/E) data in two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the physiological response to a stimulus does not have a univocal meaning. This result confirms what we found in the literature: the biometric measures reflect different internal states (e.g., variations in the arousal, the valence, the level of stress, or mental workload) during the execution of a task [54]. In particular, the proposed method concretely distinguishes between the mental effort and the emotional involvement of the operator during working activities.…”
Section: Cognitive Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the physiological response to a stimulus does not have a univocal meaning. This result confirms what we found in the literature: the biometric measures reflect different internal states (e.g., variations in the arousal, the valence, the level of stress, or mental workload) during the execution of a task [54]. In particular, the proposed method concretely distinguishes between the mental effort and the emotional involvement of the operator during working activities.…”
Section: Cognitive Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With regard to the eye-related metrics, variations due to a high level of MWL are present in pupil diameter (increment), fixation frequency (decrement), and saccadic frequency (decrement). Opposing results about fixation duration, blink duration and frequency are available in the literature [54][55][56]. For this reason, in this work, the focus is on the pupil diameter.…”
Section: The Proposed Methods For Operators' Workload Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pupil variation is linked to the sympathetic nervous system, which is involved in arousal and wakefulness (Mathot et al 2018). Therefore, how pupil size variations are modulated by operations with one or the other interface can provide information about the level of implicit workload within a joint operation (Mingardi et al 2020). It is worth noting that many variables other than the user's cognitive and emotional state (e.g., ambient lighting) can affect this metric (Kramer 2020).…”
Section: Metrics For the Assessment Of Human Factors In Hrcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, by analyzing the TLX, it could be also possible to assess subscale scores affected by the mental workload related to a specific task. In experiments where mental demand is increased, participants mentioned higher perceived mental demand, effort, and frustration, with lower subjective perception of their task performance (Mingardi et al, 2020 ). The task duration of 20 s is required to acquire that data to generate the commands, and around 1 s is needed to execute that command.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MWL is proposed as a specific task, so that even under stress and cognitive load, the patients could generate control command signals to operate the exoskeleton, and the study gauge its operational effectiveness. Moreover, MWL commands may be efficiently gauged with NASA TLX (Mansikka et al, 2019 ; Mingardi et al, 2020 ). This study assessed cognitive load using National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index (NASA TLX), a multi-dimensional assessment method with six sub-scales: including mental demands, performance, effort, and frustration (Felton et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%