Near Surface 2009 - 15th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2009
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20147098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Improved Measurement Technology for Magnetic Resonance Sounding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This comparison result was derived using the same original data set but with different processing parameters. We used a narrower bandwidth of 100 Hz (adding 10 ms of effective dead time) and also clipped the first 26 ms of data prior to the inversion to yield an effective dead time of 40 ms, which can be achieved using other surface NMR instruments (Müller-Petke et al 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Results Detection and Characterization Of Grounmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This comparison result was derived using the same original data set but with different processing parameters. We used a narrower bandwidth of 100 Hz (adding 10 ms of effective dead time) and also clipped the first 26 ms of data prior to the inversion to yield an effective dead time of 40 ms, which can be achieved using other surface NMR instruments (Müller-Petke et al 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Results Detection and Characterization Of Grounmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original surface NMR instrument designs (e.g., Hydroscope and Numis) exhibited effective dead times in the range of 30-40 ms (Bernard 2007;Müller-Petke et al 2009). In 2008, a new commercial instrument (GMR) was introduced that operated with a fixed measurement dead time of 8 ms and produced an effective post-processed dead time of 10 ms plus 1/BW, where BW is the user-selected processing bandwidth in Hz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%