2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining the spectral content of the shear waves generated by both transducers ( Figure 5 ) and confirming a consistent, narrow band frequency distribution was important because a change in shear wave bandwidth can lead to slight changes in shear wave group velocity. For the associated shear wave frequency range of 200-500 Hz, shear modulus values from our SWEI data match several subsets of published in vivo and in vitro results (Arbogast and Margulies, 1997; Thibault and Margulies, 1998; Vappou et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Examining the spectral content of the shear waves generated by both transducers ( Figure 5 ) and confirming a consistent, narrow band frequency distribution was important because a change in shear wave bandwidth can lead to slight changes in shear wave group velocity. For the associated shear wave frequency range of 200-500 Hz, shear modulus values from our SWEI data match several subsets of published in vivo and in vitro results (Arbogast and Margulies, 1997; Thibault and Margulies, 1998; Vappou et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several of these mechanisms are related to the complex shear modulus of the brain. Only recently has noninvasive imaging of the complex shear modulus in the brain been possible (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). This study is the first to assess alterations in the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue in NPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experiments on physical models of brain injury have been performed using gel-filled skulls, e.g., (Margulies et al, 1990; Meaney et al, 1995), and high-speed biplanar x-ray measurement of radio-opaque targets embedded in cadaver brains during skull impact (Hardy et al, 2001). However, these physical models provide only a sparse set of data points and lack many of the features of the living brain (Gefen and Margulies, 2004; Vappou et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%