Assessment of inpatient diabetes education throughout a structured questionnaire

Santos, Thaís Lins Dos; Franco, Flavia Fernanda; Cardim, Thalita Barreira Modena; Yamamoto, Magda Tiemi; Paulo, Rodrigo Bomeny de; Daher, Gustavo; Ribeiro, Rogério Silicani; Carvalho, José A.M.; Laselva, Cláudia Regina

doi:10.1186/1758-5996-7-s1-a173

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since their validation studies were not found, the authors were contacted and requested to provide them. Both (16,17) had used unvalidated instruments. In both cases, the instruments were excluded because it was impossible to analyze the studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes-Specific Questionnaires Validated in Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review

Bottino¹,

Madalosso²,

Garcia³

et al. 2020

Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two researchers conducted independent searches on five different electronic databases: PubMed/ MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LiLACS and Web of Science. Studies were selected that covered crosscultural adaptation methodology and validation in Brazil with type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients of any age. After reading the full-text articles, data related to psychometric characteristics were extracted from each study selected. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's α (Cα). The initial searches identified 2,211 studies. After exclusions, 26 were included, covering a total of 31 questionnaires. Questionnaires were grouped into 11 domains based on their main focus of interest: adherence (n = 8), quality of life (n = 7), diabetes knowledge (n = 3), hypoglycemia (n = 3), self-efficacy (n = 3), satisfaction with pharmaceutical services (n = 1), emotional stress (n = 2), hope (n = 1), attitude towards diabetes (n = 1), perception of disease severity (n=1), and risk of developing diabetes (n = 1). This study identified and reviewed all of the diabetes-specific questionnaires that have been validated for Brazilian Portuguese, which should facilitate selection of the most appropriate instrument for each domain of interest in future research and clinical settings. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(2):111-20

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%