2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(01)00488-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of integrity of components in piping of 500 MWe PHWR: using R-6 method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric non-linearity is important to accurately capture the elbow deformation under closing/opening bending loading. In the case of defect-free elbows, good predictions by finite element analysis are reported in the literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A significant difference in the deflection behaviour of defect-free elbows is reported for closing and opening modes of bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Geometric non-linearity is important to accurately capture the elbow deformation under closing/opening bending loading. In the case of defect-free elbows, good predictions by finite element analysis are reported in the literature [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. A significant difference in the deflection behaviour of defect-free elbows is reported for closing and opening modes of bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For homogeneous pipes and welds with defects, PROST considers the R6 [21] and FKM (Kiefner) [23] codes. Here the plastic limit stress proposed by Kiefner et al [24] for a circumferential semi-elliptical inner surface cracks in a cylinder is used, wherein only a uniform stress value is taken into account. Meanwhile, the involved variables are considered as random variables characterized by a certain distributional function.…”
Section: Determination Of Limit Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three cracks at this reactor recirculation loop. needed in the analysis are given in Table 2 (Rastogi et al, 2002). In this example, there were 10,000,000 simulations and the assessment method used is the Option 1 curve of R6 approach.…”
Section: Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%