2019
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of irrigation water quality by a Geographic Information System–Multicriteria Decision Analysis‐based model: A case study from Ankara, Turkey

Abstract: In this study, the irrigation water quality of Eryaman region in Ankara (Turkey) has been investigated using a Geographic Information System-Multicriteria Decision Analysis (GIS-MCDA)-based model. Two different irrigation water quality indices (IWQI-A and IWQI-B) based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) have been developed to provide a single suitability score for all criteria of irrigation water quality. The irrigation water quality indices were composed of 3 main criteria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They analyzed the distribution of pathogens in a watershed [ 74 ]. For enhancing the management of surface waters and groundwater a geographic information system–multicriteria decision analysis-based model was adopted to assess the quality of irrigation water [ 79 , 80 ]. However, these models are not optimized for analyzing viral contamination in reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They analyzed the distribution of pathogens in a watershed [ 74 ]. For enhancing the management of surface waters and groundwater a geographic information system–multicriteria decision analysis-based model was adopted to assess the quality of irrigation water [ 79 , 80 ]. However, these models are not optimized for analyzing viral contamination in reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] Based on a search conducted for MCDA methods through the Scopus database with the name “AHP” and “water quality” in the title, abstract and keywords, AHP is the most used MCDA method in the studies associated with water quality assessments in the last decade. [ 12,13,26,68–70 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of Ortega et al., [ 42 ] Al‐Abadi et al., [ 43 ] Chen et al., [ 44 ] Mooselu et al., [ 45 ] Lin et al. [ 46 ] can be given as examples of the AHP‐TOPSIS/TOPSIS method in the last few years, whereas those of Whittaker et al., [ 47 ] Kavurmaci and Apaydın, [ 13 ] Rezaei et al., [ 48 ] or Soltani et al. [ 49 ] are for DEA: They all successfully ranked the alternatives from the highest water quality to the lowest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the United States, irrigation withdrawals increased by two percent annually between 2010 and 2015, and accounted for approximately 42% of freshwater withdrawals in 2015 [2][3][4]. Hence, the need for safer and more efficient irrigation systems has drawn substantial attention recently and the number of related studies has rapidly increased [5][6][7]. In general, water quality is commonly evaluated by assessing chemical composition using in-situ sensor probes and/or laboratory-scale measurements in water samples collected on site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%