SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-1549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of JP-8 and DF-2 Evaporation Rate and Cetane Number Differences on a Military Diesel Engine

Abstract: The U.S. Army utilizes both world wide available diesel fuel and jet fuel (JP-8) for ground mobility applications and must maintain such fuel flexibility in order to meet mission requirements. Understanding of combustion Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a trend may imply that the ignition pressure dependency of these two fuels is very similar and that the primary driver for ignition delay differences between the two fuels is the variance in the activation energy especially at mean temperatures near 1000 K (and higher). This comment is made based on both SCE ignition data shown in figure 7 and the decreasing impact of bulk temperature on liquid length [11] which show a pressure dependency of modest variance between the two fuels for either nozzle size and a modest liquid length-temperature rate of change above 1000 K. The mixing portion of the physical delay also contributes to the ignition delay period and the CVB data was taken at mean injection pressures 50 to 100% percent higher than the Cummins VTA903 data which results in approximately a 14 to 40% increase in the injection velocity. Such a change in shear layer mixing time is not quantified at this time though will lead toward shorter physical delay times especially since the CVB nozzle hole size was a little smaller [23].…”
Section: Constant Volume Bomb (Cvb) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a trend may imply that the ignition pressure dependency of these two fuels is very similar and that the primary driver for ignition delay differences between the two fuels is the variance in the activation energy especially at mean temperatures near 1000 K (and higher). This comment is made based on both SCE ignition data shown in figure 7 and the decreasing impact of bulk temperature on liquid length [11] which show a pressure dependency of modest variance between the two fuels for either nozzle size and a modest liquid length-temperature rate of change above 1000 K. The mixing portion of the physical delay also contributes to the ignition delay period and the CVB data was taken at mean injection pressures 50 to 100% percent higher than the Cummins VTA903 data which results in approximately a 14 to 40% increase in the injection velocity. Such a change in shear layer mixing time is not quantified at this time though will lead toward shorter physical delay times especially since the CVB nozzle hole size was a little smaller [23].…”
Section: Constant Volume Bomb (Cvb) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the 90% distillation temperature has a worldwide mean value of 253 °C though 5% of the samples fell in the 200 and 225 °C range. ASTM D975 allows DF-2 to have a 90% distillation temperature range of 282 to 338 °C, and thus JP-8 evaporates considerably faster than DF-2 [11][12]. The impact of this difference has never been quantified to date, but it is anticipated to have a minor impact on the heat release event if the mean cetane number of DF-2 and JP-8 are close to their mean values assuming that the mean density of DF-2 is approximately 5% higher than JP-8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixture of 49% n-tetradecane, 30% n-decane and 21% 1-methylnaphthalene in mass basis is used for DF2. 40 A mixture of 18% n-tetradecane and 82% n-dodecane in mass basis is used 41 for JP8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of the autoignition and combustion characteristics of alternative fuels [1][2][3] in internal combustion (IC) engines is needed, to improve engine performance, emissions, and fuel economy. Gaining this understanding via experimentation is very challenging because real fuels, such as JP-8, are composed of thousands of components for which the combustion mechanisms are not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%