2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of laboratory capacity of public secondary health facilities in performing assay of selected epidemic-prone diseases in Oyo State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic microbiology capacity of the diseases was evaluated based on competence to carry out quality test, availability of functioning equipment, internal and external quality control and assessment, use of standard operating procedure and availability of potent reagent. A score of 0, 50 and 100 was given to “no”, “partial,” and “yes” responses, respectively, and the mean score was computed ( 13 , 29 ). “No” represents unexpected response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diagnostic microbiology capacity of the diseases was evaluated based on competence to carry out quality test, availability of functioning equipment, internal and external quality control and assessment, use of standard operating procedure and availability of potent reagent. A score of 0, 50 and 100 was given to “no”, “partial,” and “yes” responses, respectively, and the mean score was computed ( 13 , 29 ). “No” represents unexpected response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the average score, the diagnostic microbiology capacity was evaluated on a scale of 0–100. Scores ≤ 49% were evaluated “low”, 50–79% “fair,” and ≥ 80% “good” ( 13 , 29 ). The data were presented in descriptive statistics such as median, mode, mean and standard deviation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation