2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7215-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of landfill leachate in semi-arid climate and its impact on the groundwater quality case study: Hamedan, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Four factors were extracted to represent the main factors for groundwater quality, and to identify the different pollution sources. The first factor, with the principal components of total hardness, Cl − and TDS (greater than 0.900) and the secondary components of SO 4 2− , Pb and Mn (ranging from 0.500 to 0.900), contributed approximately 49.181% to the groundwater quality, indicating that most of the groundwater pollution in this study area resulted from the leachate leakage of the MSW landfill, similar to the substantial studies that demonstrated that the main influential groundwater pollutants from landfills included Cl − , SO 4 2− , total hardness, TDS and trace metals [34][35][36][37][38]. The TDS of this landfill was mainly determined by Cl − and SO 4 2− ; therefore, Cl − was very mobile and generally constituted nonreactive tracers, as seen in Figure 6e [18], and SO 4 2− underwent far-reaching biochemical transformations [19].…”
Section: Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Four factors were extracted to represent the main factors for groundwater quality, and to identify the different pollution sources. The first factor, with the principal components of total hardness, Cl − and TDS (greater than 0.900) and the secondary components of SO 4 2− , Pb and Mn (ranging from 0.500 to 0.900), contributed approximately 49.181% to the groundwater quality, indicating that most of the groundwater pollution in this study area resulted from the leachate leakage of the MSW landfill, similar to the substantial studies that demonstrated that the main influential groundwater pollutants from landfills included Cl − , SO 4 2− , total hardness, TDS and trace metals [34][35][36][37][38]. The TDS of this landfill was mainly determined by Cl − and SO 4 2− ; therefore, Cl − was very mobile and generally constituted nonreactive tracers, as seen in Figure 6e [18], and SO 4 2− underwent far-reaching biochemical transformations [19].…”
Section: Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Most previous studies on leachate characterization focused on the TDS concentration. Very few studies considered the concentration of TSS, TVS, TFS, and TS (Mor et al 2018;Hussein et al 2019;Vahabian et al 2019). The current study revealed that the TDS values in all samples exceeded the disposal limits (i.e., 2,000 mg/L) (MECA 1993, Table 5).…”
Section: Solids Analysismentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine the casualty relationship and degree of association among the measured contaminant levels present in the leachate. The correlation coefficient (r) value of r.0.7, 0.5,r,0.7, and ,0.5, denoted strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively (Maiti et al 2016;Vahabian et al 2019). The analysis was conducted using Microsoft ® Excel Software (Version 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical-chemical characteristics of the leachate are highly variable throughout the life of the landfills (Naveen et al, 2017). The characteristics of the deposited residues, the age of the landfill and the climatic conditions of the place have a significant effect on its composition (Kawai et al, 2012;Tałałaj et al, 2016;Mishra et al, 2018;Vahabian et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%