2001
DOI: 10.1002/ps.412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of leaching potential of aldicarb and its metabolites using laboratory studies

Abstract: The metabolites of pesticides can contaminate groundwater and pose a risk to human health when this water is used for drinking. This paper reports the results of a laboratory study on aldicarb and its main metabolites, aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulfoxide. Aldicarb and its metabolites showed Koc values (6-31) which were lower than that of atrazine (55), indicating that they are very mobile in soil. They are less persistent than atrazine (DT50 = 25 days), with DT50 values from less than 1 day and up to 12 da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), which significantly influence the degradation rates. In any case the carbamates studied do not show a high persistence; since they are reported to be very mobile in soil Fava et al, 2001), it is very important that the environment contains a microbial community which has adapted to them (Moorman, 1990) and is capable of degrading them in a short time to avoid their transport to groundwater. The results of the bacterial counts reported above show not only that the studied compounds at the applied dose do not inhibit microbial FIGURE 1 Decline in the concentrations (mg=kg) of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfoxide (and formation of aldicarb sulfone) in soil degradation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which significantly influence the degradation rates. In any case the carbamates studied do not show a high persistence; since they are reported to be very mobile in soil Fava et al, 2001), it is very important that the environment contains a microbial community which has adapted to them (Moorman, 1990) and is capable of degrading them in a short time to avoid their transport to groundwater. The results of the bacterial counts reported above show not only that the studied compounds at the applied dose do not inhibit microbial FIGURE 1 Decline in the concentrations (mg=kg) of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfoxide (and formation of aldicarb sulfone) in soil degradation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely used in Italy (Sesia, 2000) but they are neverthless toxic and able to form metabolites retaining significant toxicological properties (Nelson et al, 1981;Foran et al, 1985;Baron and Merriam, 1988;Moye and Miles, 1988;Gupta, 1994;Canna-Michaelidou and Nicolau, 1996;Alvarez-Rodriguez et al, 1997). Moreover, carbamates show a high mobility in soil Fava et al, 2001) and have been detected in significant concentrations in groundwater (Williams et al, 1988;USEPA 1984;IHP, 1998;Walker and Porter, 1990;Jones and Estes, 1995;Funari et al, 1995). Since they have significant biological properties (Gupta, 1994), they can represent a human health hazard, especially if the water is used for drinking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The herbicide degradation experiment was conducted in duplicate according to SETAC guidelines9 and previous experiments 10, 11. A simazine stock solution (1.92 mg ml −1 ) was prepared by dissolving the standard compound (99% purity) in a minimum of acetone and then diluted in sterile water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados obtidos vêm confirmar o alto potencial de lixiviação dos resíduos de aldicarbe em solos, conforme constatado por outros autores em solos norteamericanos (Jones & Back, 1984;Jones et al, 1986), europeus (Bromilow & Leistra, 1980;Fava et al, 2001) e brasileiros (Piffer & Rigitano, 1991;Scorza Junior et al, venientes da aplicação do produto de acordo com sua recomendação, seriam mínimos ou mesmo desprezíveis. Contudo, esses mesmos resultados, obtidos em condições próximas àquelas de campo, em função da utilização de lisímetros com grandes dimensões e com os solos de estrutura indeformada, confirma o risco de contaminação da água do lençol freático, e possivelmente de minas e poços de água, em solos com lençol freático próximo à superfície.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified