2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.euje.2007.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction using contrast echocardiography

Abstract: Aims Despite its relatively high intra-and inter-observer variability for left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) echocardiography is clinically still the most used modality to assess LV-EF. We studied whether adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent could decrease this variability. Methods and results Forty-eight patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography in secondharmonic mode (SHI) with and without contrast within 5 days after an acute myocardial infarction. LV-EF was determined using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is comparable to the variability of e LL that has previously been reported for 3D deformation imaging by block matching [15]. Nevertheless even the intra-observer variability of such a widely recognized parameter as LV ejection fraction exceeds 10%, when no contrast enhancement is used [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Moreover, it is comparable to the variability of e LL that has previously been reported for 3D deformation imaging by block matching [15]. Nevertheless even the intra-observer variability of such a widely recognized parameter as LV ejection fraction exceeds 10%, when no contrast enhancement is used [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Cine loops of 2–4 cardiac cycles from the parasternal short axis (papillary muscle level) and apical four chamber views were digitized at a high rate and stored offline in DICOM format. Each study was assessed for image quality by an experienced operator, blinded to all other clinical and echocardiographic data, using a 4-point scale based on the degree of endocardial border visualized (1 = 0–25%; 2 = 25%–50%; 3 = 50%–75%; 4 = 75%–100%), similar to scales used previously (21,22). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study was assessed for image quality by an experienced operator, blinded to all other clinical and echocardiographic data, using a 4-point scale based on the degree of endocardial border visualized (1 = 0-25%; 2 = 25%-50%; 3 = 50%-75%; 4 = 75%-100%), similar to scales used previously. 17, 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%