High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Lightweight Concrete-to-Concrete Interface Shear Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with those modifications, monolithic failures can occur even for smooth interface surfaces, when lightweight-aggregate concrete is used. 33 This type of failure occurred due to the low tensile/compressive strength ratio. For that reason, the Confined SLT (C-SLT) Čairovi c et al 33 was proposed (see Figure 7c).…”
Section: Slant Shear Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even with those modifications, monolithic failures can occur even for smooth interface surfaces, when lightweight-aggregate concrete is used. 33 This type of failure occurred due to the low tensile/compressive strength ratio. For that reason, the Confined SLT (C-SLT) Čairovi c et al 33 was proposed (see Figure 7c).…”
Section: Slant Shear Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 This type of failure occurred due to the low tensile/compressive strength ratio. For that reason, the Confined SLT (C-SLT) Čairovi c et al 33 was proposed (see Figure 7c). Steel square tubes were used to transversely confine the concrete, thus increasing the strength of the monolithic parts.…”
Section: Slant Shear Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation