Assessment of linear measurements with intra oral grid on intra oral periapical image – A comparison of digital and conventional film images using bisecting angle and paralleling techniques

Reddy, K Roja; Tatapudi, Ramesh; Reddy, Rekha; Kumar, C Naresh; Teja, T Navya; Swathi, G

doi:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_201_19

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is no evidence of evaluation of radiographic parameters in literature comparing surgical procedures for suprabony pockets and horizontal bone defects. The radiographic parameters were standardized using radiographic grids and linear measurement software according to previous study done by Reddy et al 21…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Effectiveness of Conventional and Microsurgical Access Flap Techniques in Managing Horizontal Bony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Clinical and Radiographic Study

Thakur,

Martande,

Ankit

et al. 2023

European Journal of General Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Periodontal microsurgery is descendant of conventional periodontal surgery to reduce surgical trauma, improve wound healing, and enhance patient compliance. This study compared the efficacy of conventional and microsurgical access flap in the management of horizontal bony defects in chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods Eight pairs of contralateral horizontal bone defects in chronic periodontitis patients were randomly allocated to control group and test group. Microsurgical access flap was carried out in test group under magnification, while control group received conventional access flap. Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), relative attachment level (RAL), and relative gingival marginal level (RGML) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Wound healing index (WHI) was evaluated after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Pain perception was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) post-surgery and after 24 hours. Radiographic defect depth was measured at baseline and after 6 months. Statistical Analysis The statistical analysis was done by SPSS statistical software. The intragroup comparison was done by repeated measures analysis of variance. The intergroup difference between both groups was done by Student's t-test. The descriptive statistics for VAS and WHI was done by Wilcoxon signed rank test. The mean difference between clinical parameters from baseline to follow-up intervals was calculated by post-hoc least significance difference analysis. Results There was significant reduction in PI, GI, PPD, and RAL within both the groups (p < 0.05). There was increase in RGML within both the groups from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05). In the intergroup comparison, test group showed better WHI and better pain perception (VAS) compared to control group (p < 0.05). No difference was found between both the groups in terms of radiographic defect depth (p > 0.5). Conclusion Both the procedures were effective in improving the clinical parameters but the microsurgical group showed better results in terms of wound healing and less postoperative pain. Both procedures showed no significant effect on radiographic defect depth.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Effectiveness of Conventional and Microsurgical Access Flap Techniques in Managing Horizontal Bony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Clinical and Radiographic Study

Thakur,

Martande,

Ankit

et al. 2023

European Journal of General Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Radiografi periapikal paling sering digunakan untuk memvisualisasikan seluruh gigi dan struktur jaringan di sekitarnya dengan kualitas gambar yang baik dan mempunyai manfaat diagnostik (Reddy et al, 2019). Menurut (Damayanti et al, 2020) radiografi periapikal banyak dipakai dalam bidang kedokteran gigi karena untuk melihat informasi secara detail tentang gigi dan jaringan periodontal.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Evaluasi Kualitas Radiograf Periapikal Teknik Bisektris : Kesalahan Penempatan Sudut Penyinaran dan Film

Suparno,

Faizah,

Zahra

2024

JID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The bisecting angle technique of periapical radiography is more often used in dental practice because the technique is practically adjustable and the patient's ability to adapt is better. Radiograph results are influenced by operator and patient factors, so management that is not optimal can cause a decrease in the quality of the radiograph, which affects interpretation, diagnosis, and treatment planning. The study aimed to determine the quality and frequency of errors in periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique due to errors in X-ray angulation and film placement at the Soelastri Dental and Oral Hospital (RSGM), University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS).Methods: The type of research is descriptive observational quantitative research with a retrospective approach. A total of 300 bisecting technique periapical radiographs from patients at RSGM Soelastri UMS in January–December 2021 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were taken in random stratification and evaluated. Radiographs are compared to ideal quality and given a National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) rating, as well as looking at the frequency of errors that occur.Results: The rating most often obtained on periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique in the study was 2 for 181 radiographs (60.33%). The frequency of X-ray angulation errors was 62.94%, while the frequency of film placement errors was 37.06%. The highest error in X-ray angulation was cone cutting at 49.13%, while the error in film placement was in the form of apical cuts at 25.65%.Conclusions: The quality of periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique at the Radiology Installation at RSGM Soelastri UMS in the period January to December 2021 generally has a rating of 2 (diagnostically acceptable) according to the NRPB, and errors are still found in the angulation of the X-ray tube and film placement.

show abstract

“…Diagnostic accuracy (e.g., root fractures, implant misfits) P tech [11,14] Bone level measurement for digital subtraction radiography P tech [20] Tooth length/root length/crown-root ratio estimation P tech [4,10,27,29,30] No difference [12] Periapical lesion size measurement P tech [24] No difference [23] Visibility of incisive foramen P tech [7] Radiation dose absorbed by thyroid and other organs P tech [19,25,26] Practice preference (from four survey studies) P tech [17,21,22] B tech [8] Radiographic error rate/reject rate P tech [13,15,18,31] B tech (for low palatal height) [9] The risk of bias assessment is summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Most of the studies were good quality case series, except that many of them did not explicitly mention if consecutive cases were examined.…”

Section: Key Practical Considerations/clinical Indications Preferred ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

Yen

Yeung

2023

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periapical radiography is a routine radiographic procedure performed by dentists on a daily basis. It can be taken with two techniques, the paralleling technique (P tech) and the bisecting angle technique (B tech). This systematic review aimed to identify the relevant literature, compare the use of P and B techs across various dental specialties, and determine the most appropriate technique to be used for different purposes in taking periapical radiographs. In January 2023, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify the studies that compared the two radiographic techniques. The search string was: (paralleling AND (“bisecting angle” OR “bisected angle”)). Manual reference tracing was also performed to identify the studies potentially missed. After screening, 26 studies were included for the qualitative review. The 26 included studies were published between 1976 and 2021. Ten of the studies were about general dentistry (dental radiology in general applications), whereas another ten studies were related to endodontics, such as working length estimation. Most studies advocated the use of the P tech for general, endodontics, implantology, and other indications. B tech was advocated for patients with a low palatal height. More future studies are needed to evaluate their performance in different scenarios with standardized equipment and radiographic positioning.

show abstract

Assessment of linear measurements with intra oral grid on intra oral periapical image – A comparison of digital and conventional film images using bisecting angle and paralleling techniques

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Comparing the Effectiveness of Conventional and Microsurgical Access Flap Techniques in Managing Horizontal Bony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Clinical and Radiographic Study

Comparing the Effectiveness of Conventional and Microsurgical Access Flap Techniques in Managing Horizontal Bony Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Patients: A Clinical and Radiographic Study

Evaluasi Kualitas Radiograf Periapikal Teknik Bisektris : Kesalahan Penempatan Sudut Penyinaran dan Film

The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About