2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-09565-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test for the upper Benue region in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous equations have been proposed in the literature for clean sand correction. Thus, when empirically obtained using liquefaction case history data, and accounting for the impacts of fines content to the CRR [23], it is expressed as: N 1(60)cs = N 1(60) + ∆N 1(60) (11) Figure 8 presents the correction values according to the amount of fines content in respect to various approaches developed for clean sand correction [27,[31][32][33]. It is clear from the figure that the Idris and Baulanger [27] curve seems to plot an average of all other proposed curves.…”
Section: Cyclic Resistance Ratio (Crr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous equations have been proposed in the literature for clean sand correction. Thus, when empirically obtained using liquefaction case history data, and accounting for the impacts of fines content to the CRR [23], it is expressed as: N 1(60)cs = N 1(60) + ∆N 1(60) (11) Figure 8 presents the correction values according to the amount of fines content in respect to various approaches developed for clean sand correction [27,[31][32][33]. It is clear from the figure that the Idris and Baulanger [27] curve seems to plot an average of all other proposed curves.…”
Section: Cyclic Resistance Ratio (Crr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors believe that the average safety factor for the site can provide valid liquefiable soil depth evidence. Wadi et al [11] conducted another study, which followed similar steps, by investigating the data from 28 boreholes with SPT measurements. The authors reported that saturated subsurface fine-grained soil up to a depth of 4 m had a low factor of safety (F.S.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following investigation, researchers indicated that the soil up to 15 meters deep had a considerable liquefaction risk at successive depths in the majority of drilling locations [22]. Using information from 28 boreholes, Wadi et al (2021) carried out a similar case study at a sugar plant location in Nigeria's Upper Benue area to assess subsurface formation for soil liquefaction analysis. According to the method in Idriss and Boulanger, the liquefaction parameters were calculated (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the method in Idriss and Boulanger, the liquefaction parameters were calculated (2014). According to the findings, there is saturated loose to medium-density sandy, silty clayey soil between 1.5 and 4.5 meters beneath the surface, and the liquefaction safety factor is less than 1 [23]. The study by Abdullah and Aal (2021) was aimed at assessing and creating maps of Jeddah City's vulnerability to liquefaction in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the average safety factor for the site can provide valid liquefiable soil depth information. Another case study was conducted by Wadi et al (2021), which followed similar steps by investigating the data from 28 boreholes with SPT measurements. The authors reported that saturated subsurface clay and silt soil up to a depth of 4 m had a low factor of safety (FS) value, which caused liquefaction risk for a designed 7.5 Mw earthquake located in Nigeria's Upper Benue region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%