Assessment of Lung Cancer YouTube Videos for Patient Education

Chai, Brandon S.; Ingledew, Paris-Ann

doi:10.1007/s13187-023-02332-6

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Methods1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current study categorizes video data into general parameters (number of views, date of publication, number of likes, and video length), source parameters (country of origin, publisher affiliation, number of subscribers, and presenter type), and video content (topic coverage, media type, target audience, advertisements, number of comments, and gross bias) as described in previous studies. 11 , 12 The goal of this review was to elucidate objective video characteristics and review the types of videos available for DRF treatment and rehabilitation; it is not a rigorous assessment of the video quality. As such, “gross bias” was defined as videos with blatantly incorrect or misleading information.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%