2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant recipients with the Mandarin Early Speech Perception (MESP) test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng and colleagues created MESP and established the threshold score for every category in 92 developmentally normal children between the ages of 2 and 5 years old [24]. MESP had also been evaluated for its practicability by assessing speech recognition in Mandarinspeaking pediatric CIs [25,26]. The English ESP contains four speech perception categories: Category 1 (Detection of Speech), Category 2 (Speech Pattern Perception), Category 3 (Some Word Identification), and Category 4 (Consistent Word Identification) [23].…”
Section: Test Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng and colleagues created MESP and established the threshold score for every category in 92 developmentally normal children between the ages of 2 and 5 years old [24]. MESP had also been evaluated for its practicability by assessing speech recognition in Mandarinspeaking pediatric CIs [25,26]. The English ESP contains four speech perception categories: Category 1 (Detection of Speech), Category 2 (Speech Pattern Perception), Category 3 (Some Word Identification), and Category 4 (Consistent Word Identification) [23].…”
Section: Test Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier the benefits and limitations of cochlear implants have been discussed using questionnaire based studies. Parents have expressed concerns in educational and social settings post implantation [3]. Such specific information can be obtained using parents as informants to document functions of the child at home and in other challenging environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those results showed that the first year's performance of CAP and SIR in hearing impaired children has significantly improved, and the advancement is much better than the second years’ performance. We further compared those results with the study of deaf children evaluated by the CAP and SIR tests,[ 13 ] those comparisons suggested that deaf children made better progress in the first year habilitation, this tendency was consisted with that seen for other studies,[ 14 15 16 ] indicating that auditory and speech development in children with hearing loss may be relatively crucial in the first year's habilitation. In the clinical work, we should pay much attention on home-based early intervention in deaf infants and toddlers and encourage parents or caregivers to participate in habilitation activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%