Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium 2006 2008
DOI: 10.1061/40941(247)157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Microbiological Water Quality after Low Pressure Events in a Distribution System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of this review, intrusion will be defined as in Besner et al (2011), i.e., contamination of the drinking water due to adverse pressure conditions and physical breaches in the system. In order for microbial contamination to occur from intrusion, three conditions are necessary: presence of pathogens surrounding the distribution system (source); occurrence of pressure transients or low-pressure events (adverse pressure conditions); and deteriorated physical conditions of the pipes (physical breach) (Hooper et al 2008;Lindley and Buchberger 2002). Intrusion was considered a medium priority issue by the National Research Council (2005); however, awareness has increased substantially since then (Besner et al 2011).…”
Section: Söderbergh Et Al 2017a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this review, intrusion will be defined as in Besner et al (2011), i.e., contamination of the drinking water due to adverse pressure conditions and physical breaches in the system. In order for microbial contamination to occur from intrusion, three conditions are necessary: presence of pathogens surrounding the distribution system (source); occurrence of pressure transients or low-pressure events (adverse pressure conditions); and deteriorated physical conditions of the pipes (physical breach) (Hooper et al 2008;Lindley and Buchberger 2002). Intrusion was considered a medium priority issue by the National Research Council (2005); however, awareness has increased substantially since then (Besner et al 2011).…”
Section: Söderbergh Et Al 2017a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirmeyer et al (2001) provided a detailed list of causes of low or negative pressure events in the daily operation of a distribution system, including valve operation, pump trip resulting from a power failure, main breaks, flushing operations, and so on. Pressure monitoring studies (Besner et al, 2011; Hooper et al, 2006; Gullick et al, 2005, 2004; Kirmeyer et al, 2001) have also indicated low or negative pressures in distribution systems. Besner et al (2011) discussed two types of low or negative pressure events: transient events lasting from milliseconds to minutes and sustained events with durations ranging from minutes to hours.…”
Section: Summary Of Existing Water Quality Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-speed pressure transient data loggers (range: minus 11 m to 141 m (−15 to 200 psi)) were installed at the outlet of the WTP and on fire hydrants in the system to allow for the detection of transient low and negative pressures. These were recording between 1 to 4 pressure values per second, a resolution that is typical for studies characterizing the occurrence of low or negative pressure events in full-scale distribution systems (Kirmeyer et al, 2001;Friedman et al, 2004;Gullick et al, 2004;Fleming et al, 2006;Hooper et al, 2006). While other types of application such as inverse transient analysis, used for leak detection and system parameter calibration, requires higher frequency of pressure information (kHz resolution), the current measuring frequency of 1 to 4 Hz is considered adequate for the application presented here, where the main interest is to detect the occurrence of negative pressure.…”
Section: Pressure Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that low or negative pressure events are not uncommon in distribution systems (Kirmeyer et al, 2001;LeChevallier et al, 2004;Gullick et al, 2004Gullick et al, , 2005Hooper et al, 2006) and that the soil and water surrounding water mains may contain fecal contamination and viruses (Karim et al, 2003). Aging drinking water infrastructure certainly provides some potential pathway for contaminant intrusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%