1995
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00055-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of minimum stream corridor width for biological conservation: Species richness and distribution along mid-order streams in Vermont, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Riparian ecosystems contain a high and unique number of plant species (Sabo et al 2005), adapted to disturbance (e.g., floods, drought) (Lyon and Gross 2005;Malanson 1993), in a restricted area of land (Lyon and Gross 2005;Malanson 1993). Riparian ecosystems also provide aquatic, water-land interface and terrestrial habitats for animal species, as well as drinking water for upland animals (Brookshire et al 2002;Hilty and Merenlender 2004;Iverson et al 2001;Machtans et al 1996;Matos et al 2008;Spackman and Hughes 1994;Virgós 2001;Williams et al 2003). Despite their high biological value, riparian ecosystems have seldom been included in systematic conservation planning (Nel et al 2009), and are becoming increasingly threatened by human activities (Salinas et al 2000) and upland plant encroachment (Huxman et al 2005), especially in the semi-arid Mediterranean region (Nel et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riparian ecosystems contain a high and unique number of plant species (Sabo et al 2005), adapted to disturbance (e.g., floods, drought) (Lyon and Gross 2005;Malanson 1993), in a restricted area of land (Lyon and Gross 2005;Malanson 1993). Riparian ecosystems also provide aquatic, water-land interface and terrestrial habitats for animal species, as well as drinking water for upland animals (Brookshire et al 2002;Hilty and Merenlender 2004;Iverson et al 2001;Machtans et al 1996;Matos et al 2008;Spackman and Hughes 1994;Virgós 2001;Williams et al 2003). Despite their high biological value, riparian ecosystems have seldom been included in systematic conservation planning (Nel et al 2009), and are becoming increasingly threatened by human activities (Salinas et al 2000) and upland plant encroachment (Huxman et al 2005), especially in the semi-arid Mediterranean region (Nel et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest microhabitats with swamp stands and hygrophilic vegetation create breeding opportunities for wetland birds with specialized foraging or nesting requirements such as Sedge Warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, Bluethroats Luscinia svecica or Penduline Tits Remiz pendulinus (Hagemeier & Blair 1997). Also, the breadth of tree belts along river courses affected the structure of the avian communities (Spackman & Hughes 1995). Significantly narrower growth (< 30 m) along regulated river segments compared to wide meanders (≥ 90 m) were characterized by sparsely stocked tree lines with low shrub coverage and a thin top tree canopy, resulting in a poorly structured organisation of the vertical branch and foliage profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters use for setting the suitability threshold with regard to economic reason were taken from National Forest policy 1992 and National Forestry Act 1993,report by Muziol (1999) under a Malaysian-German Technical Cooperation Project for sustainable forest management and conservation. In designing a hydrological buffer, reviews of related scientific literature were carried out (see Wenger, 1999;Hodges and Krementz, 1996;Keller et al, 1993;Kinley and Newhouse, 1997, Spackman and Hughes, 1995and Mitchell, 1996. Table 4 show the class boundaries and standardised measurement employed for each criterion.…”
Section: Standardization (Rating) Of Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%