2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of motility of ejaculated, liquid-stored boar spermatozoa using computerized instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the use of CASA also allows obtaining more objective, detailed and repeatable determination of semen motility characteristics of sperm cells in boar ejaculates (Tejerina et al. ; Contri et al. ).…”
Section: Accurate and Precise Semen Assessment Is Essential In Efficimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of CASA also allows obtaining more objective, detailed and repeatable determination of semen motility characteristics of sperm cells in boar ejaculates (Tejerina et al. ; Contri et al. ).…”
Section: Accurate and Precise Semen Assessment Is Essential In Efficimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average CoV across 10 samples, each measured 5 times, of 5.2% for total motility and 6.9% for progressive motility suggest a good level of precision for motility analysis results. In an evaluation of two CASA systems using boar semen at a concentration of 40 × 10 6 sperm/ml, one system (QualiSperm ® , Biophos, Geneva, Switzerland) was found to have a similar CoV (6.0%), while another (SM‐CMA ® , Mika Medical GmbH, Rosenheim, Germany) resulted in 12.4% (Tejerina, Buranaamnuay, Saravia, Wallgren, & Rodriguez‐Martinez, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they assessed sperm motility by subjective visual estimation, and no data showed about sperm kinetics. Tejerina et al (2008) discussed that sperm motility parameters analysed using CASA system provided a more objective assessment of sperm motility in mammals. CASA technology has several advantages as compared to manual counting, such as, fast analysis; increase consistence when the same setting is used, and high statistical power due to objective analysis of numerous sperm (Schleh and Leoni, 2013;Lammers et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%