2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20200905.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Muscle Function in Severe and Malnourished COVID-19 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…an objective value of muscle strength such as the hand grip. In our previous pilot study, 14 SES was able to differentially distinguish patients with low or high progression of hand grip strength during hospitalisation (4.7%±5.6% vs 19.3%±15.3%; p=0.008). In addition, patients with SES <7 also had lower brachial circumference (26.2±3.7 cm vs 29.5±3.8 cm; p=0.024) and lower calf circumference (34.9±4.2 cm vs 30.7±3.7 cm; p=0.020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…an objective value of muscle strength such as the hand grip. In our previous pilot study, 14 SES was able to differentially distinguish patients with low or high progression of hand grip strength during hospitalisation (4.7%±5.6% vs 19.3%±15.3%; p=0.008). In addition, patients with SES <7 also had lower brachial circumference (26.2±3.7 cm vs 29.5±3.8 cm; p=0.024) and lower calf circumference (34.9±4.2 cm vs 30.7±3.7 cm; p=0.020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In practice, patients were asked to evaluate their arm and leg strength in comparison with their strength prior to COVID-19. As suggested by Krznaric et al, 14 patients were asked their degree of difficulty in lifting or carrying a weight, walking across the room, rising from a chair or bed and to evaluate these difficulties using a 10-point verbal or visual analogue scales (10=same strength as before illness and 0=total loss of strength.…”
Section: Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the articles included subjects who were clinically confirmed positive COVID-19. A total of 51, 796 patients were included in the systematic review ranged from 30 participants in a study conducted in France [44] to 27,961 participants in a study conducted in USA [54]. The median age of the participants ranged from 50 to 89 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median age of the participants ranged from 50 to 89 years. All studies had both sexes with the percentage of women varying between 19.2% [44] and 65.7% [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%